Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31952525›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Examining health care providers' and middle-level managers' readiness for change: a qualitative study.

Tujuanna Austin, Samia Chreim, Agnes Grudniewicz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Goal-Oriented Care: A Catalyst for Person-Centred System Integration.International journal of integrated care · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tujuanna AustinInstitute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, M5T 3M6, Canada.
Samia ChreimTelfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, 55 Laurier Ave E, Ottawa, K1N 6N5, Canada. chreim@telfer.uottawa.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3139-1115
Agnes GrudniewiczTelfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, 55 Laurier Ave E, Ottawa, K1N 6N5, Canada.
University of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa 603024-110199-2001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReadiness is a critical precursor of successful change; it denotes whether those involved in the change are motivated and empowered to participate in the change. Research on readiness tends to focus on frontline providers or individuals in non-managerial positions and offers limited attention to individuals in middle management positions who are expected to lead frontline providers in change implementation. Yet middle-level managers are also recipients of changes that are planned and decreed by those in higher positions. This study sought to examine both frontline provider and middle manager readiness for change in the context of primary care program integration.

methodsUsing a qualitative case study approach, we examined how frontline providers and middle managers experienced six readiness factors: discrepancy, appropriateness, valence, efficacy, fairness and trust in management. Data were collected through documents, meeting observation and semi-structured interviews with frontline providers and middle managers involved in the change.

resultsThe findings highlighted similarities and differences in readiness experiences of frontline providers and middle managers. Across both types of participants, we found that the notion of valence should be expanded to consider individuals' evaluation of benefits to patients and the health system; efficacy applies to both content and process of change; fairness and trust in management findings require further exploration to determine their appropriateness to be incorporated in models of readiness for change; and trust in management (or lack of trust) has a cascading influence across the levels in the organization.

conclusionsOur study makes a contribution by nuancing and extending conceptualizations of individual readiness factors, and by highlighting the central role of middle manager readiness for change. Implications of the study include the need to consider readiness factors prior to the implementation of change and the importance of fostering readiness throughout all levels of the organization.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelOrganizational InnovationAdministrative PersonnelHealth PersonnelHumansPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchHealthcare managementIndividual readiness for changeMiddle-level managersPrimary careProgram integrationReadiness for change

Identifiers

PMID31952525
PMCPMC6969476
OpenAlexW3001580957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.