ArticleBMC medical research methodology2020
The TRANSFER Approach for assessing the transferability of systematic review findings.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Factors that influence the provision of enteral feeding for critically ill children: a qualitative evidence synthesis.BMC nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Healthcare workers' informal uses of mobile phones and other mobile devices to support their work: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Public participation in decisions about measures to manage the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.BMJ global health · 2024Pooled it
- Patients' perspectives on the relevance of biosimilars' outcomes in oncology: qualitative study with nominal group technique.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Pooled it
- Healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences of communicating with people over 50 years of age about vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Systematic mapping of checklists for assessing transferability.Systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Review
- Mapping evidence for health policy and systems decision-making: a spectrum approach bridging tacit and scientific knowledge across local and global contexts.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal dynamics and nonlinear drivers of ecosystem service synergies and trade-offs in Shaanxi, China.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Expert stakeholders on the role of qualitative research in World Health Organisation guidelines.Health policy and planning · 2026Article
- Conducting evidence synthesis and developing evidence-based advice in public health and beyond: A scoping review and map of methods guidance.Research synthesis methods · 2026Article
- Iron supplementation in children to prevent deficiency and anaemia: A qualitative synthesis.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025Article
- Using evidence from civil society in national and subnational health policy processes: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Case management interventions seeking to counter radicalisation to violence and related forms of violence: A systematic review.Campbell systematic reviews · 2024Review
- Experiences and Challenges of Mothers in Caring for Infants with Delayed Developmental Milestones: A Case of Dodoma Region, Tanzania.The East African health research journal · 2024Article
- Article
- A meta-ethnography of how children and young people with chronic non-cancer pain and their families experience and understand their condition, pain services, and treatments.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- Use of second-generation antipsychotics in autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.BMJ open · 2023Article
- PROTOCOL: Case management interventions seeking to counter radicalisation to violence: A systematic review of tools and approaches.Campbell systematic reviews · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSystematic reviews are a key input to health and social welfare decisions. Studies included in systematic reviews often vary with respect to contextual factors that may impact on how transferable review findings are to the review context. However, many review authors do not consider the transferability of review findings until the end of the review process, for example when assessing confidence in the evidence using GRADE or GRADE-CERQual. This paper describes the TRANSFER Approach, a novel approach for supporting collaboration between review authors and stakeholders from the beginning of the review process to systematically and transparently consider factors that may influence the transferability of systematic review findings.
methodsWe developed the TRANSFER Approach in three stages: (1) discussions with stakeholders to identify current practices and needs regarding the use of methods to consider transferability, (2) systematic search for and mapping of 25 existing checklists related to transferability, and (3) using the results of stage two to develop a structured conversation format which was applied in three systematic review processes.
resultsNone of the identified existing checklists related to transferability provided detailed guidance for review authors on how to assess transferability in systematic reviews, in collaboration with decision makers. The content analysis uncovered seven categories of factors to consider when discussing transferability. We used these to develop a structured conversation guide for discussing potential transferability factors with stakeholders at the beginning of the review process. In response to feedback and trial and error, the TRANSFER Approach has developed, expanding beyond the initial conversation guide, and is now made up of seven stages which are described in this article.
conclusionsThe TRANSFER Approach supports review authors in collaborating with decision makers to ensure an informed consideration, from the beginning of the review process, of the transferability of the review findings to the review context. Further testing of TRANSFER is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.