Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31952359›Full record

ReviewGenes2020

Clustered DNA Double-Strand Breaks: Biological Effects and Relevance to Cancer Radiotherapy.

Jac A Nickoloff, Neelam Sharma, Lynn Taylor

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 182 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The current status of FLASH particle therapy: a systematic review.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Development and In Vitro Evaluation of [International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jac A NickoloffDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Neelam SharmaDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Lynn TaylorDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Colorado State University · US

Funding

METNASE ROLES IN NHEJ, DNA INTEGRATION AND TRANSLOCATIONR01GM084020 · NIGMS · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI NICKOLOFF, JAC A · 2009 to 2016
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells manage to survive, thrive, and divide with high accuracy despite the constant threat of DNA damage. Cells have evolved with several systems that efficiently repair spontaneous, isolated DNA lesions with a high degree of accuracy. Ionizing radiation and a few radiomimetic chemicals can produce clustered DNA damage comprising complex arrangements of single-strand damage and DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). There is substantial evidence that clustered DNA damage is more mutagenic and cytotoxic than isolated damage. Radiation-induced clustered DNA damage has proven difficult to study because the spectrum of induced lesions is very complex, and lesions are randomly distributed throughout the genome. Nonetheless, it is fairly well-established that radiation-induced clustered DNA damage, including non-DSB and DSB clustered lesions, are poorly repaired or fail to repair, accounting for the greater mutagenic and cytotoxic effects of clustered lesions compared to isolated lesions. High linear energy transfer (LET) charged particle radiation is more cytotoxic per unit dose than low LET radiation because high LET radiation produces more clustered DNA damage. Studies with I-SceI nuclease demonstrate that nuclease-induced DSB clusters are also cytotoxic, indicating that this cytotoxicity is independent of radiogenic lesions, including single-strand lesions and chemically "dirty" DSB ends. The poor repair of clustered DSBs at least in part reflects inhibition of canonical NHEJ by short DNA fragments. This shifts repair toward HR and perhaps alternative NHEJ, and can result in chromothripsis-mediated genome instability or cell death. These principals are important for cancer treatment by low and high LET radiation.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA, NeoplasmDNA RepairGenomic InstabilityNeoplasmsHumansDNA, Neoplasmchromatincomplex DNA lesionscytotoxicityDNA base damageDNA double-strand breaksgenome instabilityionizing radiationradiation oncology

Identifiers

PMID31952359
PMCPMC7017136
OpenAlexW3000198818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.