Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31952137›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Tools Used to Measure the Physical State of Women with Celiac Disease: A Review with a Systematic Approach.

Alejandro Martínez-Rodríguez, Daniela Alejandra Loaiza-Martínez, Javier Sánchez-Sánchez, Pablo J Marcos-Pardo, Soledad Prats, Fernando Alacid, Jacobo A Rubio-Arias

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Alejandro Martínez-RodríguezFaculty of Sciences, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4747-3465
Daniela Alejandra Loaiza-MartínezFaculty of Sports, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), 30107 Murcia, Spain.
Javier Sánchez-SánchezSchool of Sport and Science, European University of Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain.
Pablo J Marcos-PardoFaculty of Sports, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), 30107 Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1624-5013
Soledad PratsFaculty of Sciences, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1330-2388
Fernando AlacidDepartment of Education, Health Research Centre, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6126-5289
Jacobo A Rubio-AriasLFE Research Group, Department of Health and Human Performance, Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2496-2426
Universidad Católica de Murcia · ESUniversity of Alicante · ESUniversidad Politécnica de Madrid · ESUniversity of Almería · ESUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Celiac disease (CD) is an immunological disorder that mainly affects the small intestine, generating an inflammatory process in response to the presence of gluten (a protein). Autoimmune diseases are part of a group of diseases that are difficult to diagnose without a specific protocol or consensus to detect them due to the number of symptoms and diseases with which it has a relationship. Therefore, the aim of this review was to analyze the diagnostic tools of CD used in middle-aged women, to compare the use and effectiveness of the different tools, and to propose a strategy for the use of the tools based on the results found in the literature. The present research followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. The search was conducted in the following databases: Scielo, PubMed, Web of Science, and Worldwide Science org. In the initial literature search, 2004 titles and relevant abstracts were found. Among them, 687 were duplicates, leaving 1130 articles. Based on the inclusion criteria, only 41 articles passed the selection process; 4 main types of analyses appear in the studies: blood tests, questionnaires, clinical history, and biopsy. It can be said that none of the analyses have a 100% reliability since most of them can present false negatives; therefore, the best way to diagnose celiac disease up to now is through a combination of different tests (Immunoglobulin A and small intestinal biopsy).

Indexed as

Celiac DiseaseFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin AIntestine, SmallReproducibility of ResultsImmunoglobulin Adiagnosisdietglutensymptomswomen

Identifiers

PMID31952137
PMCPMC7014319
OpenAlexW2999917427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.