SynthesisPloS one2020
A systematic review and meta-analysis of acute kidney injury in the intensive care units of developed and developing countries.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of acute kidney injury in Mexico; a systematic review and meta-analysis of pre-pandemic reports.Renal failure · 2025Pooled it
- ICU-acquired acute kidney injury in critically ill adults: a retrospective cohort study of risk factors and KDIGO stage dynamics in a Brazilian ICU.Renal failure · 2026Article
- Construction and validation of a predictive nomogram for 28-day mortality in critically ill patients with toxic encephalopathy.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Early-start vs. conventional-start peritoneal dialysis in AKI from cardiorenal syndrome type 1: a randomized controlled trial (STARRT-PD).International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Automated CT segmentation of kidneys successfully quantifies changes in total kidney volume in ICU patients, a retrospective cohort study.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Observational
- Chronic Kidney Disease and Superimposed Acute Kidney Injury: Greater Impact of Acute Insults on Outcomes.International journal of nephrology · 2026Article
- Changing epidemiology, prescription and outcomes of acute kidney injury patients treated by peritoneal dialysis during 20 years: a cohort study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Primer on large language models: an educational overview for intensivists.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- Ten tips on how to reduce iatrogenic acute kidney injury.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Review
- Dialysis decision in critically ill patients in intensive care unit.Acute and critical care · 2025Article
- Article
- Acute kidney injury in hospitalized children in 20 hospitals of China's Hunan Province: a cross-sectional survey.Renal failure · 2024Article
- Acute kidney injury developed in the intensive care unit: a population-based prospective cohort study in the Brazilian Amazon.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Behind the scenes: Key lessons learned from the RELIEVE-AKI clinical trial.Journal of critical care · 2024Review
- Clinical Profile and Short-Term Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury in Elderly Patients in a Tertiary Care Center.Cureus · 2024Article
- Nanoselenium attenuates renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024Article
- Dosing Regimen for Cefotaxime Should Be Adapted to the Stage of Renal Dysfunction in Critically Ill Adult Patients-A Retrospective Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The evolution of public attention in acute kidney injury and continuous renal replacement therapy: trends analysis from 2004 to 2024.Frontiers in nephrology · 2024Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAlthough the majority of the global population lives in developing countries, most of the epidemiological data related to intensive care unit (ICU) acute kidney injury (AKI) comes from developed countries. This systematic review aims to ascertain the methodology of studies on ICU AKI patients in developing and developed countries, to determine whether epidemiological comparisons between these two settings are possible, and to present a summary estimate of AKI incidence.
methodsA systematic review of published studies reporting AKI in intensive care units (2005-2015) identified in PubMed, LILACS, and IBECs databases was conducted. We compared developed and developing countries by evaluating study methodology, AKI reference serum creatinine definitions, population characteristics, AKI incidence and mortality. AKI incidence was calculated with a random-effects model.
resultsNinety-two studies were included, one of which reported data from both country categories: 60 from developed countries (1,057,332 patients) and 33 from developing countries (34,539 patients). In 78% of the studies, AKI was defined by the RIFLE, AKIN or KDIGO criteria. Oliguria had 11 different definitions and reference creatinine 23 different values. For the meta-analysis, 38 studies from developed and 18 from developing countries were selected, with similar AKI incidence: 39.3% and 35.1%, respectively. The need for dialysis, length of ICU stay and mortality were higher in developing countries.
conclusionAlthough patient characteristics and AKI incidence were similar in developed and developing countries, main outcomes were worse in developing country studies. There are significant caveats when comparing AKI epidemiology in developed and developing countries, including lack of standardization of reference serum creatinine, oliguria and the timeframe for AKI assessment. Larger, prospective, multicenter studies from developing countries are urgently needed to capture AKI data from the overall population without ICU access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.