Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31951615›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Characterization and analytical validation of a new antigenic rapid diagnostic test for Ebola virus disease detection.

Céline Couturier, Atsuhiko Wada, Karen Louis, Maxime Mistretta, Benoit Beitz, Moriba Povogui, Maryline Ripaux, Charlotte Mignon, Bettina Werle, Adrien Lugari and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Ebola Virus Disease and Current Therapeutic Strategies: A Review.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Céline CouturierBIOASTER, LYON, France.
Atsuhiko WadaFUJIFILM, Ushijima, Kaisei-machi, Ashigarakami-gun Kanagawa, Japan.
Karen LouisBIOASTER, LYON, France.
Maxime MistrettaBIOASTER, LYON, France.
Benoit BeitzBIOASTER, LYON, France.
Moriba PovoguiCentre de Recherche Et de Formation en Infectiologie de Guinée (CERFIG), République de Guinée.
Maryline RipauxBIOASTER, LYON, France.
Charlotte MignonBIOASTER, LYON, France.
Bettina WerleBIOASTER, LYON, France.
Adrien LugariBIOASTER, LYON, France.
Delphine PannetierINSERM Jean Mérieux BSL4 Laboratory, LYON, France.
Sabine GodardINSERM Jean Mérieux BSL4 Laboratory, LYON, France.
Anne BocquinINSERM Jean Mérieux BSL4 Laboratory, LYON, France.
Stéphane MelyINSERM Jean Mérieux BSL4 Laboratory, LYON, France.
Ismaël BéavoguiCHRS Macenta, c/o Mission Philafricaine, Conakry, République de Guinée.
Jean HébélamouCHRS Macenta, c/o Mission Philafricaine, Conakry, République de Guinée.
David LeuenbergerCHRS Macenta, c/o Mission Philafricaine, Conakry, République de Guinée.ORCID 0000-0002-7921-1489
Philippe LeissnerBIOASTER, LYON, France.
Takeshi YamamotoFUJIFILM, Ushijima, Kaisei-machi, Ashigarakami-gun Kanagawa, Japan.
Patrick LécineBIOASTER, LYON, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8091-7286
Christophe VédrineBIOASTER, LYON, France.
Julie ChaixBIOASTER, LYON, France.
BIOASTER · FRInserm · FRFujifilm (Japan) · JPInstitut de Recherche Agronomique de Guinée · GN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemorrhagic fever outbreaks are difficult to diagnose and control in part because of a lack of low-cost and easily accessible diagnostic structures in countries where etiologic agents are present. Furthermore, initial clinical symptoms are common and shared with other endemic diseases such as malaria or typhoid fever. Current molecular diagnostic methods such as polymerase chain reaction require trained personnel and laboratory infrastructure, hindering diagnostics at the point of need, particularly in outbreak settings. Therefore, rapid diagnostic tests such as lateral flow can be broadly deployed and are typically well-suited to rapidly diagnose hemorrhagic fever viruses, such as Ebola virus. Early detection and control of Ebola outbreaks require simple, easy-to-use assays that can detect very low amount of virus in blood. Here, we developed and characterized an immunoassay test based on immunochromatography coupled to silver amplification technology to detect the secreted glycoprotein of EBOV. The glycoprotein is among the first viral proteins to be detected in blood. This strategy aims at identifying infected patients early following onset of symptoms by detecting low amount of sGP protein in blood samples. The limit of detection achieved by this sGP-targeted kit is 2.2 x 104 genome copies/ml in plasma as assayed in a monkey analytical cohort. Clinical performance evaluation showed a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 85.7% when evaluated with plasma samples from healthy controls and patients infected with Zaire Ebola virus from Macenta, Guinea. This rapid and accurate diagnostic test could therefore be used in endemic countries for early detection of infected individuals in point of care settings. Moreover, it could also support efficient clinical triage in hospitals or clinical centers and thus reducing transmission rates to prevent and better manage future severe outbreaks.

Indexed as

ImmunoassayAntigens, ViralEbolavirusHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHumansPoint-of-Care SystemsReproducibility of ResultsAntigens, Viral

Identifiers

PMID31951615
PMCPMC6992227
OpenAlexW2999804270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.