Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31951599›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2020

A two-arm parallel double-blind randomised controlled pilot trial of the efficacy of Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids for the treatment of women with endometriosis-associated pain (PurFECT1).

Ibtisam M Abokhrais, Fiona C Denison, Lucy H R Whitaker, Philippa T K Saunders, Ann Doust, Linda J Williams, Andrew W Horne

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. New Potential Pharmacological Options for Endometriosis Associated Pain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ibtisam M AbokhraisMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Fiona C DenisonMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Lucy H R WhitakerMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Philippa T K SaundersCentre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Ann DoustMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Linda J WilliamsUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Andrew W HorneMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9656-493X
MRC Centre for Reproductive Health · GBCentre for Inflammation Research · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office PCL/19/01Medical Research Council MR/N022556/1Medical Research Council MR/N024524/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometriosis is defined by the presence of endometrial-like tissue (lesions) outside the uterus, commonly on the pelvic peritoneum. It affects 6-10% of women and is associated with debilitating pelvic pain. Current management options are often unsatisfactory. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (O-PUFA) have the potential to reduce the painful symptoms associated with endometriosis, reduce lesion size, preserve the patient's ability to conceive, and have minimal side effects. We performed a two-arm, parallel double-blinded randomised controlled trial to inform the planning of a future multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of O-PUFA for endometriosis-associated pain.

objectivesThe primary objectives of the trial were to assess recruitment and retention rates. The secondary objectives were to determine the acceptability to women of the proposed methods of recruitment, randomisation, treatments and questionnaires, to estimate the variability in the proposed primary endpoints to inform the sample size calculation and to refine the research methodology for the future definitive trial.

methodsWe recruited women with endometriosis from June 2016 to June 2017 and randomised them to eight weeks of treatment with O-PUFA or olive oil. Pain scores and quality of life questionnaires were collected at baseline and eight weeks. We calculated the proportion of eligible women randomised, and of randomised participants who were followed up to eight weeks. Acceptability questionnaires were used to evaluate women's experiences of the trial.

resultsThe proportion of eligible participants who were randomised was 45.2% (33/73) and 81.8% (27/33) completed the study. The majority of participants described their overall trial experience favourably and there were no adverse events in either group.

conclusionOur pilot trial supports the feasibility of a future larger trial to definitively evaluate the efficacy of O-PUFA for endometriosis-associated pain.

trial registrationThe trial was registered on the ISRCTN registry (registration number ISRCTN44202346).

Indexed as

AdultDouble-Blind MethodEndometriosisFatty Acids, Omega-3Feasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePatient SelectionPelvic PainPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultFatty Acids, Omega-3

Identifiers

PMID31951599
PMCPMC6968860
OpenAlexW2999730814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.