Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31951263›Full record

ArticlePhysical therapy2020

The Sensor Technology and Rehabilitative Timing (START) Protocol: A Randomized Controlled Trial for the Rehabilitation of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Lucy Parrington, Deborah A Jehu, Peter C Fino, Samuel Stuart, Jennifer Wilhelm, Natalie Pettigrew, Charles F Murchison, Mahmoud El-Gohary, Jess VanDerwalker, Sean Pearson and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Physical therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Use of Technology for Exercise Prescription Among Persons With Dizziness: A Mixed-Methods Study.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Lucy ParringtonDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon.
Deborah A JehuDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University; Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, and Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Peter C FinoDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University; Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System; and Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Recreation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Samuel StuartDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University; and Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Jennifer WilhelmDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University.
Natalie PettigrewDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University.
Charles F MurchisonDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University; and Department of Biostatistics at the University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama.
Mahmoud El-GoharyADPM Inc, Portland, Oregon.
Jess VanDerwalkerADPM Inc.
Sean PearsonADPM Inc.
Timothy HullarDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University.
James C ChesnuttDepartments of Family Medicine, Neurology, and Orthopedics & Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University.
Robert J PeterkaNational Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System.
Fay B HorakDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University; Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System; and APDM Inc.
Laurie A KingDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97239 (USA); Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System; and National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System.
Oregon Health & Science University · USVA Portland Health Care System · USVancouver Coastal Health · CA

Funding

Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute - The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR002369 · NCATS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Cynthia D Morris, Christopher G. Slatore · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
Interdisciplinary Training Program in MetabolismT32DK091317 · NIDDK · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI SCOTT A SUMMERS · 2011 to 2026
$4.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002369NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK091317RRD VA I50 RX002361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical practice for rehabilitation after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is variable, and guidance on when to initiate physical therapy is lacking. Wearable sensor technology may aid clinical assessment, performance monitoring, and exercise adherence, potentially improving rehabilitation outcomes during unsupervised home exercise programs.

objectiveThe objectives of this study were to: (1) determine whether initiating rehabilitation earlier than typical will improve outcomes after mTBI, and (2) examine whether using wearable sensors during a home-exercise program will improve outcomes in participants with mTBI.

designThis was a randomized controlled trial.

settingThis study will take place within an academic hospital setting at Oregon Health & Science University and Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, and in the home environment.

participantsThis study will include 160 individuals with mTBI.

interventionThe early intervention group (n = 80) will receive one-on-one physical therapy 8 times over 6 weeks and complete daily home exercises. The standard care group (n = 80) will complete the same intervention after a 6- to 8-week wait period. One-half of each group will receive wearable sensors for therapist monitoring of patient adherence and quality of movements during their home exercise program. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measure will be the Dizziness Handicap Inventory score. Secondary outcome measures will include symptomatology, static and dynamic postural control, central sensorimotor integration posturography, and vestibular-ocular-motor function. LIMITATIONS: Potential limitations include variable onset of care, a wide range of ages, possible low adherence and/or withdrawal from the study in the standard of care group, and low Dizziness Handicap Inventory scores effecting ceiling for change after rehabilitation.

conclusionsIf initiating rehabilitation earlier improves primary and secondary outcomes post-mTBI, this could help shape current clinical care guidelines for rehabilitation. Additionally, using wearable sensors to monitor performance and adherence may improve home exercise outcomes.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWearable Electronic DevicesAdultAmbulatory CareBrain ConcussionExercise TherapyHumansMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareSample SizeTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID31951263
PMCPMC8493665
OpenAlexW2999414330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.