Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31951197›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

Mechanisms underlying the response of mouse cortical networks to optogenetic manipulation.

Alexandre Mahrach, Guang Chen, Nuo Li, Carl van Vreeswijk, David Hansel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mapping global brain reconfigurations following local targeted manipulations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Optogenetic Stimulation Recruits Cortical Neurons in a Morphology-Dependent Manner.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Top-down modulation in canonical cortical circuits with short-term plasticity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexandre MahrachCNRS-UMR 8002, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9077-5808
Guang ChenDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States.
Nuo LiDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States.
Carl van VreeswijkCNRS-UMR 8002, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, Paris, France.
David HanselCNRS-UMR 8002, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1352-6592
Baylor College of Medicine · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

Multi-regional neural circuit dynamics underlying short-term memoryR21NS104781 · NINDS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI DRUCKMANN, SHAUL, LI, NUO · 2017 to 2018
$448k
Agence Nationale de la Recherche 09-SYSC-002-01Agence Nationale de la Recherche 13-BSV4-0014-02Agence Nationale de la Recherche 14-NEUC-0001-01NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS104781Simons Collaboration on the Global Brain 543005Simons Foundation 543005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

GABAergic interneurons can be subdivided into three subclasses: parvalbumin positive (PV), somatostatin positive (SOM) and serotonin positive neurons. With principal cells (PCs) they form complex networks. We examine PCs and PV responses in mouse anterior lateral motor cortex (ALM) and barrel cortex (S1) upon PV photostimulation in vivo. In ALM layer five and S1, the PV response is paradoxical: photoexcitation reduces their activity. This is not the case in ALM layer 2/3. We combine analytical calculations and numerical simulations to investigate how these results constrain the architecture. Two-population models cannot explain the results. Four-population networks with V1-like architecture account for the data in ALM layer 2/3 and layer 5. Our data in S1 can be explained if SOM neurons receive inputs only from PCs and PV neurons. In both four-population models, the paradoxical effect implies not too strong recurrent excitation. It is not evidence for stabilization by inhibition.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleGABAergic NeuronsInterneuronsMaleMiceNerve NetOptogeneticsSensorimotor Cortexcortexdynamicsexcitationinbhibitionmouseneuronal networksneurosciencetheoretical neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID31951197
PMCPMC7012611
OpenAlexW2954464181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.