Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31950891›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2020

Predicting high-cost care in a mental health setting.

Craig Colling, Mizanur Khondoker, Rashmi Patel, Marcella Fok, Robert Harland, Matthew Broadbent, Paul McCrone, Robert Stewart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Craig CollingApplied Clinical Informatics Lead, SLaM Biomedical Research Center, South London & Maudsley Foundation NHS Trust, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5178-0383
Mizanur KhondokerSenior Lecturer in Medical Statistics, University of East Anglia, Norwich Medical School, UK.
Rashmi PatelMRC UKRI Health Data Research UK Fellow, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London; and South London & Maudsley Foundation NHS Trust, UK.
Marcella FokVisiting Researcher, Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London; and Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Robert HarlandClinical Director of Psychosis, Psychosis CAG, South London & Maudsley Foundation NHS Trust, UK.
Matthew BroadbentInformatics Lead, SLaM Biomedical Research Center, South London & Maudsley Foundation NHS Trust, UK.
Paul McCroneProfessor of Health Economics, School of Health Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, UK.
Robert StewartProfessor of Psychiatric Epidemiology and Clinical Informatics, Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London; and South London & Maudsley Foundation NHS Trust, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17214Medical Research Council MR/S003118/1Medical Research Council MR/T045302/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe density of information in digital health records offers new potential opportunities for automated prediction of cost-relevant outcomes.

aimsWe investigated the extent to which routinely recorded data held in the electronic health record (EHR) predict priority service outcomes and whether natural language processing tools enhance the predictions. We evaluated three high priority outcomes: in-patient duration, readmission following in-patient care and high service cost after first presentation.

methodWe used data obtained from a clinical database derived from the EHR of a large mental healthcare provider within the UK. We combined structured data with text-derived data relating to diagnosis statements, medication and psychiatric symptomatology. Predictors of the three different clinical outcomes were modelled using logistic regression with performance evaluated against a validation set to derive areas under receiver operating characteristic curves.

resultsIn validation samples, the full models (using all available data) achieved areas under receiver operating characteristic curves between 0.59 and 0.85 (in-patient duration 0.63, readmission 0.59, high service use 0.85). Adding natural language processing-derived data to the models increased the variance explained across all clinical scenarios (observed increase in r2 = 12-46%).

conclusionsEHR data offer the potential to improve routine clinical predictions by utilising previously inaccessible data. Of our scenarios, prediction of high service use after initial presentation achieved the highest performance.

Indexed as

Digital health recordsmental health servicenatural language processingprediction

Identifiers

PMID31950891
PMCPMC7001466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.