Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31950890›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2020

Acellular Biologic Nipple-Areolar Complex Graft:

Nicholas C Pashos, David M Graham, Brian J Burkett, Ben O'Donnell, Rachel A Sabol, Joshua Helm, Elizabeth C Martin, Annie C Bowles, William M Heim, Vince C Caronna and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. [Research progress in nipple projection reconstruction based on tissue graft support].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas C PashosCenter for Stem Cell Research and Regenerative Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
David M GrahamBioAesthetics Corporation, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Brian J BurkettDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Ben O'DonnellCenter for Stem Cell Research and Regenerative Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Rachel A SabolCenter for Stem Cell Research and Regenerative Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Joshua HelmCenter for Stem Cell Research and Regenerative Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Elizabeth C MartinDepartment of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Annie C BowlesCenter for Stem Cell Research and Regenerative Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
William M HeimBioAesthetics Corporation, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Vince C CaronnaBioAesthetics Corporation, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Kristin S MillerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tulane University, School of Science and Engineering, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Brooke GraspergeTulane National Primate Research Center, Covington, Louisiana, USA.
Scott SullivanCenter for Restorative Breast Surgery, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Abigail E ChaffinDepartment of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Bruce A BunnellCenter for Stem Cell Research and Regenerative Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Tulane University · USLouisiana State University · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

Tulane NPRC SPF Sheltered Outdoor Enclosure ExpansionP51OD011104 · OD · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI L Lee HAMM · 2012 to 2026
$142.4M
Tracking & Evaluation CoreU54GM104940 · NIGMS · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI JUDD E SHELLITO · 2012 to 2026
$69.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940NIH HHS P51 OD011104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are more than 3 million breast cancer survivors living in the United States of which a significant number have undergone mastectomy followed by breast and nipple-areolar complex (NAC) reconstruction. Current strategies for NAC reconstruction are dependent on nonliving or nonpermanent techniques, including tattooing, nipple prosthetics, or surgical nipple-like structures. Described herein is a tissue engineering approach demonstrating the feasibility of an allogeneic acellular graft for nipple reconstruction. Nonhuman primate (NHP)-derived NAC tissues were decellularized and their extracellular matrix components analyzed by both proteomic and histological analyses. Decellularized NHP nipple tissue showed the removal of intact cells and greatly diminished profiles for intracellular proteins, as compared with intact NHP nipple tissue. We further evaluated the biocompatibility of decellularized grafts and their potential to support host-mediated neovascularization against commercially available acellular dermal grafts by performing

Indexed as

Biological ProductsBreast NeoplasmsMammaplastyAnimalsFemaleMacaca mulattaMastectomyMiceNipplesPilot ProjectsPlastic Surgery ProceduresProteomicsBiological Productsacellular biological matrixbreast cancerbreast reconstructionnipple-areolar complexnipple reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID31950890
PMCPMC7462026
OpenAlexW2999171163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.