Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31950702›Full record

Observational studyBJS open2020

Effect of intraperitoneal chemotherapy concentration on morbidity and survival.

F M K Elekonawo, W J van Eden, W Y van der Plas, R S G Ewalds, L A W de Jong, A J A Bremers, P H J Hemmer, N F M Kok, S Kruijff, A G J Aalbers and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BJS open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Advances in the management of peritoneal malignancies.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

F M K ElekonawoDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1726-186X
W J van EdenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
W Y van der PlasDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
R S G EwaldsDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
L A W de JongDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
A J A BremersDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
P H J HemmerDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
N F M KokDepartment of Surgical Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
S KruijffDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
A G J AalbersDepartment of Surgical Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
P R de ReuverDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelected patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases are treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The concentration of intraperitoneal chemotherapy reflects the administered dose and perfusate volume. The aim of this study was to calculate intraperitoneal chemotherapy concentration during HIPEC and see whether this was related to clinical outcomes.

methodsAn observational multicentre study included consecutive patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases who were treated with CRS-HIPEC between 2010 and 2018 at three Dutch centres. Data were retrieved from prospectively developed databases. Chemotherapy dose and total circulating volumes of carrier solution were used to calculate chemotherapy concentrations. Postoperative complications, disease-free and overall survival were correlated with intraoperative chemotherapy concentrations. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression, Cox regression and survival analyses were performed.

resultsOf 320 patients, 220 received intraperitoneal mitomycin C (MMC) and 100 received oxaliplatin. Median perfusate volume for HIPEC was 5·0 (range 0·7-10·0) litres. Median intraperitoneal chemotherapy concentration was 13·3 (range 7·0-76·0) mg/l for MMC and 156·0 (91·9-377·6) mg/l in patients treated with oxaliplatin. Grade III or higher complications occurred in 75 patients (23·4 per cent). Median overall survival was 36·9 (i.q.r. 19·5-62·9) months. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy concentrations were not associated with postoperative complications or survival.

conclusionCRS-HIPEC was performed with a wide variation in intraperitoneal chemotherapy concentrations that were not associated with complications or survival.

Indexed as

AdultAgedColorectal NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansHyperthermic Intraperitoneal ChemotherapyMaleMiddle AgedMitomycinMorbidityNetherlandsOxaliplatinPeritoneal NeoplasmsMitomycinOxaliplatin

Identifiers

PMID31950702
PMCPMC7093784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.