Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31950481›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2020

Efficacy and safety of iloprost in patients with septic shock-induced endotheliopathy-Protocol for the multicenter randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded, investigator-initiated trial.

Morten H Bestle, Niels E Clausen, Peter Søe-Jensen, Klaus T Kristiansen, Theis Lange, Pär I Johansson, Jakob Stensballe, Anders Perner

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04123444 (Efficacy and Safety of 72-hour Infusion of Prostacyclin), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04123444 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Efficacy and Safety of 72-hour Infusion of Prostacyclin (1 Nanogram(ng)/Kilo(kg)/Minute(Min)) in Patients With Septic Shock Induced Endotheliopathy - a Multicentre Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Blinded, Investigator-initiated Trial"

TypeinterventionalSponsorJakob Stensballe, MD, PhDRan2019 to 2022Enrolled279ConditionsSeptic ShockArmsIloprost, Isotonic saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Morten H BestleDepartment of Intensive Care, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Hillerod, Denmark.
Niels E ClausenDepartment of Intensive Care, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Peter Søe-JensenDepartment of Intensive Care, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Klaus T KristiansenDepartment of Intensive Care, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Theis LangeSection of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pär I JohanssonCapital Region Blood Bank, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9778-5964
Jakob StensballeCapital Region Blood Bank, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anders PernerDepartment of Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4668-0123
Rigshospitalet · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKBispebjerg Hospital · DKHerlev Hospital · DKHvidovre Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Europe 700.000 new cases of sepsis occur annually and more than 100.000 of these patients die due to multiorgan failure (MOF). We have identified shock-induced endotheliopathy (SHINE) to be associated with development of MOF and mortality. Furthermore, in patients with septic shock those with circulating levels of thrombomodulin (TM) above 10 ng/mL have twice the mortality (56% vs 28%) than those with levels below this level. Pilot studies indicate that infusion of iloprost (1 ng/kg/min) is associated with improved endothelial function in patients with septic shock. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis is a multicenter, randomized, blinded, investigator-initiated, adaptive phase 2B trial in up to 384 patients with septic shock-induced endotheliopathy defined by TM > 10 ng/mL who are allocated 1:1 to 72 hours continuous infusion of iloprost 1 ng/kg/min or placebo (equal volume of saline). The primary outcome is the mean daily modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in the ICU up to day 90. Secondary outcomes include 28- and 90-day all-cause mortality, days alive without vasopressor in the ICU within 90 days, days alive without mechanical ventilation in the ICU within 90 days, days alive without renal replacement therapy in the ICU within 90 days, numbers of serious adverse reactions, and the number of serious adverse events within the first 7 days. DISCUSSION: This trial tests the safety and efficacy of iloprost vs placebo for 72 hours in patients with septic shock and SHINE. The outcome measures focus on the potential effect of the intervention to mitigate organ failure.

trial registrationCOMBAT-SHINE trial-EudraCT no. 2019-001131-31-Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04123444-Ethics Committee no. H-19018258.

Indexed as

DenmarkEndothelium, VascularHumansIloprostMulticenter Studies as TopicMultiple Organ FailureOrgan Dysfunction ScoresRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignShock, SepticTreatment OutcomeVasodilator AgentsIloprostVasodilator Agentsclinical trialiloprostseptic shock-induced endotheliopathythrombomodulin

Identifiers

PMID31950481
PMCPMC7186821
OpenAlexW2999027240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.