ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2020
Relation matters: relative depth order is stored in working memory for depth.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visual working memory is impaired in Alzheimer's disease: evidence from real-world objects and perceptual organization.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- Article
- The role of ensemble average differs in working memory for depth and planar information.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- The Short-Term Retention of Depth.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Increasing perceptual separateness affects working memory for depth - re-allocation of attention from boundaries to the fixated center.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Effect of attentional selection on working memory for depth in a retro-cueing paradigm.Memory & cognition · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Working memory is considered as a cognitive memory buffer for temporarily holding, processing, and manipulating information. Although working memory for verbal and visual information has been studied extensively in the past literature, few studies have systematically investigated how depth information is stored in working memory. Here, we show that the memory performance for detecting changes in stereoscopic depth is low when there is no change in relative depth order, and the performance is reliably better when depth order is changed. Increasing the magnitude of change only improves memory performance when depth order is kept constant. However, if depth order is changed, the performance remains high, even with a small change magnitude. Our findings suggest that relative depth order is a better indicator for working memory performance than absolute metric depth. The memory representation for individual depth is not independent, but inherently relational, revealing a fundamental organizing principle for depth information in the visual system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31950456What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.