Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31950393›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2020

A multimethod approach examining the relative contributions of optimism and pessimism to cardiovascular disease risk markers.

John M Felt, Michael A Russell, John M Ruiz, Jillian A Johnson, Bert N Uchino, Matthew Allison, Timothy W Smith, Daniel J Taylor, Chul Ahn, Joshua Smyth

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

John M FeltThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA. jzf434@psu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7334-6489
Michael A RussellThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
John M RuizThe University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ, USA.
Jillian A JohnsonThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Bert N UchinoUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Matthew AllisonUniversity of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Timothy W SmithUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Daniel J TaylorThe University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ, USA.
Chul AhnUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Joshua SmythThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA. jms1187@psu.edu.
Pennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Utah · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

PREVENTION AND METHODOLOGY TRAINING (PAMT)T32DA017629 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI Eric D Claus, Rina D Eiden · 2005 to 2026
$9.5M
Social Vigilance and Atherosclerotic RiskR01HL109340 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS · PI TAYLOR, DANIEL J · 2012 to 2014
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL109340NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA017629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although dispositional optimism and pessimism are associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD), their relative independence and unique contributions to CVD risk are unclear. This study addressed these issues by using multiple indicators of optimism and pessimism and linking them to objective risk factors for CVD. A diverse sample of adults (N = 300) completed baseline assessments (including global reports of optimism and pessimism), a 2-day/1-night EMA protocol with ambulatory blood pressure (BP) at 45-min intervals, and had inflammatory markers and carotid intima media imaging collected. EMA reports of momentary positive and negative expectations were averaged to form intraindividual (person) means of optimism and pessimism, respectively. Optimism and pessimism were only modestly correlated between- and within-assessment methods. Higher pessimism, regardless of assessment method, predicted both lower odds of whether BP dipping occurred and a smaller degree of dipping, but was unrelated to other biomarkers. Optimism was not uniquely predictive of CVD risk factors. Pessimism thus appears to exhibit stronger relative contribution to risk indicators of CVD than optimism.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesPessimismAdultBiomarkersBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHumansOptimismBiomarkersAmbulatory blood pressureCarotid artery stenosisEcological momentary assessmentInflammatory markersOptimismPessimism

Identifiers

PMID31950393
PMCPMC7363506
OpenAlexW3000277132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.