Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31950374›Full record

Observational studyInvestigational new drugs2020

Effectiveness and safety of eribulin in Japanese patients with HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer: a 2-year post-marketing observational study in a real-world setting.

Kenichi Inoue, Masato Takahashi, Hirofumi Mukai, Takashi Yamanaka, Chiyomi Egawa, Yukinori Sakata, Hiroki Ikezawa, Toshiyuki Matsuoka, Junji Tsurutani

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Investigational new drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Kenichi InoueDivision of Breast Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan. ino.bad.ken@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2686-8732
Masato TakahashiDepartment of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, Hokkaido, Japan.
Hirofumi MukaiDivision of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
Takashi YamanakaDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Kanagawa, Japan.
Chiyomi EgawaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
Yukinori SakataClinical Planning and Development Department, Eisai Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroki IkezawaClinical Planning and Development Department, Eisai Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiyuki MatsuokaClinical Planning and Development Department, Eisai Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Junji TsurutaniAdvanced Cancer Translational Research Institute, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Eisai (Japan) · JPKanagawa Prefectural Hospital Organization · JPKansai Rosai Hospital · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPNational Hospital Organization Hokkaido Medical Center · JPSaitama Cancer Center · JPShowa University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Data on eribulin as the first- or second-line treatment in a clinical setting, especially the overall survival (OS) of patients, are scarce. Therefore, we assessed the effectiveness and safety of eribulin as the first-, second-, and third- or later-line treatments in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer in Japan. Methods This multicenter, prospective, post-marketing, observational study enrolled patients from September 2014 to February 2016 in Japan and followed them for 2 years. Patients were categorized by eribulin use into the first-, second-, and third- or later-line treatment groups. Results Of 651 registered patients, 637 patients were included in the safety and effectiveness analysis. In all, first-, second-, and third or later-line treatment groups, median OS (95% confidence interval) were 15.6 (13.8-17.6), 22.8 (17.3-31.0), 16.3 (12.4-19.9), and 12.6 (11.2-15.1) months and time to treatment failure (TTF) (95% confidence interval) were 4.2 (3.7-4.4), 5.2 (3.7-5.9), 4.2 (3.7-5.1), and 3.8 (3.5-4.2) months, respectively. Prolonged TTF was associated with complications of diabetes and the development of peripheral neuropathy after eribulin treatment, according to multivariate Cox regression analysis. Grade ≥ 3 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 61.7% of the patients. Neutropenia (49.5%) was the most common grade ≥ 3 ADR in all groups. Conclusions The effectiveness and safety results of eribulin as the first- or second-line treatment were favorable. Thus, these suggest eribulin may be a first-line treatment candidate for patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer in Japan.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsAsian PeopleBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleFuransHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKetonesMiddle AgedNeutropeniaPolyether PolyketidesProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingAntineoplastic AgentsERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinaseseribulinFuransKetonesPolyether PolyketidesEribulinJapanOverall survivalPost-marketing study

Identifiers

PMID31950374
PMCPMC7497681
OpenAlexW2999313171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.