Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31950350›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2020

Subjective recovery from pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain the first 6 weeks after delivery: a prospective longitudinal cohort study.

Anne Marie Gausel, Stefan Malmqvist, Knut Andersen, Inger Kjærmann, Jan Petter Larsen, Ingvild Dalen, Inger Økland

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Progressive Changes in Lumbopelvic Alignment during the Three Month-Postpartum Recovery Period.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Letter to the Editor concerning "Subjective recovery from pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain the first 6 weeks after delivery: a prospective longitudinal cohort study" by Gausel AM, et al. (Eur Spine J; [2020]: doi:10.1007/s00586-020-06288-9).European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anne Marie GauselDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stavanger University Hospital, P.O. Box 8100, Stavanger N-4068, Stavanger, Norway. anne.marie.gausel@sus.no.
Stefan MalmqvistDepartment of Research, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Knut AndersenDepartment of Research, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Inger KjærmannDepartment of Research, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Jan Petter LarsenNetwork for Medical Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Ingvild DalenDepartment of Research, Section of Biostatistics, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Inger ØklandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stavanger University Hospital, P.O. Box 8100, Stavanger N-4068, Stavanger, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to investigate the subjective recovery from pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PGP) during the first 6 weeks after delivery and to detect possible risk factors for a poor recovery.

methodsThe participants were included in this study at the routine ultrasound examination at 18 weeks of pregnancy. The women received a weekly SMS with the question "How many days during the last week has your PGP been bothersome?" The SMS-track from the final 10 weeks of pregnancy and first 6 weeks after delivery were assessed and sorted, based on individual graphs. A total of 130 women who reported PGP during pregnancy and met for clinical examination 6 weeks after delivery were included in the study.

resultsIn all, 83% of the women experienced substantial recovery from severe or moderate PGP within 6 weeks after delivery. Of these, 44% reported a substantial recovery already within 2 weeks after delivery. More multiparous women, women reporting PGP the year before pregnancy, and women with high pain intensity during pregnancy had a poor recovery.

conclusionsThe prognosis following PGP in pregnancy is good and the majority of women recovered substantially from severe and moderate pregnancy-related PGP within 6 weeks after delivery. For many women, a subjective substantial recovery occurred within 2 weeks after delivery. Predictors for a poor recovery were multiparity, PGP the year before pregnancy and a high pain intensity during pregnancy. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Indexed as

Pelvic Girdle PainPregnancy ComplicationsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesPain MeasurementPregnancyProspective StudiesPelvic girdle painPersistentPregnancyRecoveryRisk factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.