ArticleThe AAPS journal2020
Dose Correction for a Michaelis-Menten Approximation of a Target-Mediated Drug Disposition Model with a Multiple Intravenous Dosing Regimens.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a method for implementing dose correction in a Michaelis-Menten (M-M) approximation of a target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) model with multiple intravenous (IV) bolus administrations. We derived the formula of a correction factor (Fcorr) for each dose in a multiple IV bolus dosing regimens for M-M model. Fcorr depends on the residual free drug amount prior IV bolus dosing event and dose amount. We conducted a stochastic simulation and estimation (SSE) exercise based on therapeutic antibody PK parameters to evaluate the effect of Fcorr on parameter estimation. Previously published clinical PK data of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) from four clinical trials in healthy subjects receiving multiple IV bolus doses were analyzed by both M-M model with and without dose correction (MMC and MMNC) as well as the rapid-binding/quasi-steady-state (RB/QSS) TMDD models. Our results showed that MMNC introduced bias to fixed-effect parameter estimates and overestimated random-effect variables. Compared with MMC, MMNC was not able to adequately characterize the nonlinearity in the PK data of antibody and rHuEPO. The MMC-based simulation demonstrated that thricely weekly 10 IU/kg rHuEPO dosing regimen yielded Fcorr = 0.5. This result suggested that the lower-than-expected exposure for rHuEPO at low dose is due to target binding. An M-M approximation of the TMDD model should include a dose correction to avoid model misfitting and potential bias in the estimated PK parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.