Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31950307›Full record

Trial reportAIDS and behavior2020

The Influence of Relationship Dynamics and Sexual Agreements on Perceived Partner Support and Benefit of PrEP Use Among Same-Sex Male Couples in the U.S.

Erin M Kahle, Akshay Sharma, Stephen Sullivan, Rob Stephenson

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erin M KahleCenter for Sexuality and Health Disparities, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA. ekahle@umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6060-9852
Akshay SharmaCenter for Sexuality and Health Disparities, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Stephen SullivanCenter for Sexuality and Health Disparities, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Rob StephensonCenter for Sexuality and Health Disparities, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
University of Michigan · US

Funding

Providing online counseling for home-based HIV testing.R01HD078131 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI STEPHENSON, ROB B. · 2014 to 2017
$2.7M
NICHD NIH HHS 5R01HD078131-04NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD078131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Use of Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention by men who have sex with men (MSM) may be impacted by relationship dynamics. We assessed perceived partner support of PrEP use and benefit of PrEP by relationship characteristics among male couples. Baseline data from a randomized control trial of video-based HIV counseling and testing among male couples in the U.S. were used in adjusted multilevel regression models to assess individual and dyadic characteristics. Among 659 participants, 73.3% thought their partner would be supportive of their PrEP use; 26.7% reported their partner would not support PrEP use, which was significantly associated with intimate partner violence (IPV) (p = 0.008). Most (57.7%) did not believe PrEP would be beneficial to them or their partner. Couples with a sexual agreement allowing outside partners were significantly associated with higher perceived support of partners for PrEP (p < 0.001) and benefit of PrEP use (p < 0.001). Perceived partner support of PrEP was high but perceived benefit of PrEP was low, both shaped by relationship dynamics that highlight the need for tailored dyadic interventions. The association between perceived PrEP support and IPV points to the need to integrate relationship contexts in HIV prevention programs.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MalePre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexual PartnersHumansMaleSexual and Gender MinoritiesSexual BehaviorSocial SupportUnited StatesHIVMale couplesPre-exposure prophylaxisRelationship dynamics

Identifiers

PMID31950307
PMCPMC7319880
OpenAlexW3000161558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.