Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31950302›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2020

Using DICOM Metadata for Radiological Image Series Categorization: a Feasibility Study on Large Clinical Brain MRI Datasets.

Romane Gauriau, Christopher Bridge, Lina Chen, Felipe Kitamura, Neil A Tenenholtz, John E Kirsch, Katherine P Andriole, Mark H Michalski, Bernardo C Bizzo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Clinical Metadata-Guided Limited-Angle CT Image Reconstruction.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Real-world brain imaging in a population-based cohort enables accurate markers for dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Romane GauriauMGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Boston, MA, USA. romane.gauriau@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5508-2803
Christopher BridgeMGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Boston, MA, USA.
Lina ChenMGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Boston, MA, USA.
Felipe KitamuraDASA, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Neil A TenenholtzMGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Boston, MA, USA.
John E KirschDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Katherine P AndrioleMGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Boston, MA, USA.
Mark H MichalskiMGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Boston, MA, USA.
Bernardo C BizzoMGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Boston, MA, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCenter for Systems Biology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing interest in machine learning (ML) in healthcare is driven by the promise of improved patient care. However, how many ML algorithms are currently being used in clinical practice? While the technology is present, as demonstrated in a variety of commercial products, clinical integration is hampered by a lack of infrastructure, processes, and tools. In particular, automating the selection of relevant series for a particular algorithm remains challenging. In this work, we propose a methodology to automate the identification of brain MRI sequences so that we can automatically route the relevant inputs for further image-related algorithms. The method relies on metadata required by the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standard, resulting in generalizability and high efficiency (less than 0.4 ms/series). To support our claims, we test our approach on two large brain MRI datasets (40,000 studies in total) from two different institutions on two different continents. We demonstrate high levels of accuracy (ranging from 97.4 to 99.96%) and generalizability across the institutions. Given the complexity and variability of brain MRI protocols, we are confident that similar techniques could be applied to other forms of radiological imaging.

Indexed as

MetadataRadiologyBrainFeasibility StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingAutomationDICOMMachine learningSeries categorizationWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID31950302
PMCPMC7256138
OpenAlexW3000207138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.