Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31950285›Full record

ArticleProtoplasma2020

Updating embryonic ontogenesis in Araucaria angustifolia: from Burlingame (1915) to the present.

Daniela Goeten, Gladys D Rogge-Renner, Éder C Schmidt, Zenilda L Bouzon, Francine L Farias-Soares, Miguel P Guerra, Neusa Steiner

Abstract readHistorical Article
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Protoplasma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniela GoetenPlant Physiology Laboratory, Department of Botany, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, 88040-900, Brazil.
Gladys D Rogge-RennerBiological Sciences Department, University of Joinville Region, Joinville, SC, 89219-710, Brazil.
Éder C SchmidtCentral Laboratory of Electron Microscopy, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, 88040-400, Brazil.
Zenilda L BouzonCentral Laboratory of Electron Microscopy, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, 88040-400, Brazil.
Francine L Farias-SoaresPlant Developmental Physiology and Genetics Laboratory, Department of Plant Science, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, 88034-001, Brazil.
Miguel P GuerraPlant Developmental Physiology and Genetics Laboratory, Department of Plant Science, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, 88034-001, Brazil.
Neusa SteinerPlant Physiology Laboratory, Department of Botany, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, 88040-900, Brazil. neusa.steiner@ufsc.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6063-9242
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BRUniversidade da Região de Joinville · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 311156/2017-7Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 457940/2014-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study addresses gaps in our understanding of pre-fertilization and archegonia development and reinterprets embryonic ontogenesis from Burlingame (Bot Gaz 59:1-39, 1915) to the present based on timescale and structural features allowing us to determine functionally and developmentally accurate terminology for all these stages in A. angustifolia. Different from previous reports, only after pollination, pre-fertilization tissue development occurs (0-13 months after pollination (MAP)) and gives rise to a mature megagametophyte. During all this period, pollen is in a dormant state at the microphyla, and pollen tube germination in nucellus tissue is only observed at the stage of archegonia formation (13 MAP) and not at the free nuclei stage as reported before. For the first time, 14 months after pollination, a fertilization window was indicated, and at 15 MAP, the polyzygotic polyembryony from different archegonia was also seen. After that, subordinated proembryo regression occurs and at least three embryonic developmental stages of dominant embryo were characterized: proembryogenic, early embryogenic, and late embryogenic (15-23 MAP). Along these stages, histochemical and ultrastructural analyses suggest the occurrence of cell death in suspensor and in cap cells of dominant embryo that was not previously reported. The differentiation of meristems, procambium, pith, and cortex tissues in late embryogenic stage was detailed. The morphohistological characterization of pre-fertilization and embryonic stages, together with the timescale of megastrobili development, warranted a referential map of female reproductive structure in this species.

Indexed as

AraucariaHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyPollenArchegoniumCell deathConifersMegasporocytePolyembryogenesisSyngamy

Identifiers

PMID31950285
OpenAlexW3000364258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.