Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31950230›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2020

[Digital health literacy-conceptual contextualization, measurement, and promotion].

Uwe H Bittlingmayer, Kevin Dadaczynski, Diana Sahrai, Stephan van den Broucke, Orkan Okan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Learning digital health literacy in school: results of a representative survey of pupils in Germany].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Factors Affecting Adherence in Allergic Disorders and Strategies for Improvement.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. [Digital health literacy in Germany: current status, concepts, and challenges].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Uwe H BittlingmayerInstitut für Soziologie, Pädagogische Hochschule Freiburg, Kunzenweg 21, 79117, Freiburg, Deutschland. uwe.bittlingmayer@ph-freiburg.de.
Kevin DadaczynskiFachbereich Pflege und Gesundheit, Hochschule Fulda, Fulda, Deutschland.
Diana SahraiInstitut Spezielle Pädagogik und Psychologie, Pädagogische Hochschule FHNW, Muttenz, Schweiz.
Stephan van den BrouckePsychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgien.
Orkan OkanFakultät für Erziehungswissenschaft, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of digital health literacy can be regarded as the result of the increasing social permeation of digital media and their use in everyday life. Due to increasing accessibility and ubiquity, there is an increasing need not only for searching and finding, but especially for assessing the reliability as well as selecting and applying health information for one's own health concerns. In the context of digitization, it needs to be emphasized that users are not just passive recipients, but rather actively participate in the communication process by interacting with existing content or by sharing their own health-related information.With particular focus on children and adolescents, this paper provides an overview of the current state of research on digital health literacy. In addition to its terminological and conceptual foundations and its links with media literacy, the relationship between digital health literacy and social and health inequality is discussed. Inequalities are not only generated by access to digital media but, above all, by the skills required for their use. After an overview of available instruments is provided, initial reflections on how to promote the individual and structural dimension of digital health literacy with focus on school settings is given.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyHealth PromotionHealth Status DisparitiesAdolescentChildGermanyHumansInternetReproducibility of ResultsChildren and adolescentsConceptDigital health literacyMedia literacyOperationalization

Identifiers

PMID31950230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.