Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31950020›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer prevention2019

Food Intake Behavior in Cancer Survivors in Comparison With Healthy General Population; From the Health Examination Center-based Cohort.

Tung Hoang, Jeonghee Lee, Jeongseon Kim, Boyoung Park

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer prevention, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Adherence to healthy lifestyle recommendations in Brazilian cancer survivors.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tung HoangNational Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6653-3406
Jeonghee LeeNational Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9072-6507
Jeongseon KimNational Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0889-2686
Boyoung ParkDepartment of Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1902-3184
National Cancer Center · KRHanyang University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to investigate the food intake behavior of cancer survivors based on main sources of energy intake from different food groups in comparison with healthy individuals.

methodsBaseline survey data from the Health Examinee cohort, which recruited participants from 2014 to 2013 were applied. A total of 5,269 cancer survivors and 5,219 healthy subjects without comorbidities who were matched by age, sex, and enrollment center were included in the analysis. The proportion of energy intake for 17 food groups was devided into lower median and median or upper. OR and 95% CIs were determined to measure the difference of energy intake proportion in cancer survivors, five major types of cancer survivors versus healthy individuals.

resultsGenerally, the proportion of calories intake from sugars and sweets, meat and poultry, oils and fats, and beverage was lower in cancer survivors than in healthy individuals (OR = 0.83 [95% CI = 0.79-0.88], 0.75 [95% CI = 0.71-0.80], 0.84 [95% CI = 0.80-0.89], and 0.93 [95% CI = 0.88-0.99], respectively) with more prominently shown in breast, colon, and thyroid cancer individuals. In contrast, cancer survivors tended to intake calories from potatoes and starches, legume, seeds and nuts, vegetables, mushrooms, fruits, and seasonings more than healthy individuals (OR = 1.09 [95% CI = 1.03-1.16], 1.13 [95% CI = 1.06-1.19], 1.15 [95% CI = 1.09-1.22], 1.07 [95% CI = 1.01-1.13], 1.07 [95% CI = 1.02-1.14], 1.15 [95% CI = 1.08-1.21], and 1.17 [95% CI = 1.10-1.23], respectively) which were more prominent in gastric and breast cancer survivors.

conclusionsThe dietary behavior measured by main sources of energy intake in cancer survivors was different from healthy individuals in terms of several food groups. Although there are nutrition guidelines for cancer survivors, because of the differences between Western population and Asian people in terms of food culture, the guidelines for balanced nutritious behavior should be established among Asian cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Cancer survivorsEnergy intakeNutrition status

Identifiers

PMID31950020
PMCPMC6951320
OpenAlexW2999659478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.