Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31949996›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

Knowledge and Attitude Toward Strabismus in Western Province, Saudi Arabia.

Mona S Khojah, Sarah Al-Ghamdi, Shahad Alaydarous, Jumanah J Homsi, Ahmed Alhasan, Sara Alsubaie, Nizar Alhibshi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Understanding parental hurdles in accessing strabismus treatment.Advances in ophthalmology practice and research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mona S KhojahEpidemiology and Public Health, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Sarah Al-GhamdiEpidemiology and Public Health, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Shahad AlaydarousEpidemiology and Public Health, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Jumanah J HomsiEpidemiology and Public Health, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Ahmed AlhasanEpidemiology and Public Health, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, SAU.
Sara AlsubaieMedicine, AlMaarefa University, Riyadh, SAU.
Nizar AlhibshiOphthalmology, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Strabismus is a common eye condition having a potential subsequent impact on the psychological and socioeconomic domains of individuals suffering from strabismus. Therefore, this study aimed to find out the level of knowledge and treatability of strabismus in the western province of Saudi Arabia. Methods An observational cross-sectional study was conducted in 2018 among people who live in the western region of Saudi Arabia and were age 16 and above by using an online self-administered questionnaire. Results Out of 589 participants, 52.8% reported the correct definition of strabismus. The majority of responders agreed that strabismus is treatable (71.5%). In addition, a statically significant relation was found between knowledge of strabismus treatability and age, gender, work state, and level of education. Most participants were aware of the risk factors and complications of strabismus. Conclusion Our study found that the majority of participants had good knowledge of the definition, treatment, and complications of untreated strabismus. Participant's age, education level, work state, and income were the main factors found to be significantly associated with knowledge of strabismus treatment options.

Indexed as

attitudeknowledgestrabismussubsequent

Identifiers

PMID31949996
PMCPMC6944158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.