Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31949913›Full record

ArticleIUCrJ2020

Measuring energy-dependent photoelectron escape in microcrystals.

Selina L S Storm, Adam D Crawshaw, Nicholas E Devenish, Rachel Bolton, David R Hall, Ivo Tews, Gwyndaf Evans

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IUCrJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Electrons and X-rays for diffraction and imaging.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Identifying and avoiding radiation damage in macromolecular crystallography.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2024
    Article
  8. A redox switch allows binding of Fe(II) and Fe(III) ions in the cyanobacterial iron-binding protein FutA fromProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Selina L S StormDiamond Light Source, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0DE, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9223-5576
Adam D CrawshawDiamond Light Source, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0DE, United Kingdom.
Nicholas E DevenishDiamond Light Source, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0DE, United Kingdom.
Rachel BoltonDiamond Light Source, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0DE, United Kingdom.
David R HallDiamond Light Source, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0DE, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5333-6136
Ivo TewsBiological Sciences, Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4704-1139
Gwyndaf EvansDiamond Light Source, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0DE, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6079-2201
Diamond Light Source · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increasing trend of using microcrystals and intense microbeams at synchrotron X-ray beamlines, radiation damage becomes a more pressing problem. Theoretical calculations show that the photoelectrons that primarily cause damage can escape microcrystals. This effect would become more pronounced with decreasing crystal size as well as at higher energies. To prove this effect, data from cryocooled lysozyme crystals of dimensions 5 × 3 × 3 and 20 × 8 × 8 µm mounted on cryo-transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) grids were collected at 13.5 and 20.1 keV using a PILATUS CdTe 2M detector, which has a similar quantum efficiency at both energies. Accurate absorbed doses were calculated through the direct measurement of individual crystal sizes using scanning electron microscopy after the experiment and characterization of the X-ray microbeam. The crystal lifetime was then quantified based on the

Indexed as

CdTe detectorcryo-TEM sample mountsmicrocrystalsphotoelectron escape

Identifiers

PMID31949913
PMCPMC6949606
OpenAlexW2995661015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.