Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31949833›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2018

Expression of cleaved caspase-3 predicts good chemotherapy response but poor survival for patients with advanced primary triple-negative breast cancer.

Xiaodan Liu, Shenyi Jiang, Xin Tian, Youhong Jiang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Ground-glass opacity-featured lung adenocarcinoma has no response to chemotherapy.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaodan LiuMolecular Oncology Laboratory of Cancer Research Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Shenyi JiangDepartment of General Medical Practice, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Xin TianMolecular Oncology Laboratory of Cancer Research Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Youhong JiangMolecular Oncology Laboratory of Cancer Research Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
First Hospital of China Medical University · CNGeneral Hospital of Shenyang Military Region · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess cleaved caspase-3 (CC3), Ki-67, and E-cadherin (E-cad) expression in relation to chemotherapy response and prognosis of patients with advanced primary triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

methodsCC3 expression was detected immunohistochemically in 67 pre-chemotherapy biopsy samples. Ki67 and E-cad levels were obtained from patients' medical records.

resultsCC3-positivity (N = 32; 47.8%) was associated with a higher first-line chemotherapy overall response rate (ORR; P = 0.028) and second-line chemotherapy clinical benefit rate (CBR; P = 0.033). The Ki-67 high-risk group (N = 51; 76.1%) exhibited a reduced second-line chemotherapy CBR (P = 0.024). The E-cad negative group (N = 25; 37.3%) exhibited a lower first-line chemotherapy ORR (P = 0.044) and CBR (P<0.001), and a lower second-line chemotherapy CBR (P = 0.020). CC3, Ki-67, and E-cad were significant predictors of third-line chemotherapy ORR or CBR. Similar numbers of chemotherapy cycles were completed by the CC3-positive and -negative groups. The Ki-67 high-risk and E-cad negative groups completed fewer second-line chemotherapy cycles (P = 0.038) and fewer first-line chemotherapy cycles, respectively (P = 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analyses identified worse outcomes for the CC3-positive, Ki-67 high-risk, and E-cad negative groups than for their corresponding comparison groups (P<0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified CC3 expression and an absence of E-cad expression as independent survival factors (P<0.05).

conclusionsOur CC3-positive group exhibited a better chemotherapy response, but a worse prognosis. The Ki-67 high-risk and E-cad negative groups exhibited both a worse chemotherapy response and worse prognosis.

Indexed as

chemotherapy responsecleaved caspase-3prognosisTriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID31949833
PMCPMC6962992
OpenAlexW3027127240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.