Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31949624›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2018

Detection and genotyping of human papillomavirus virus (HPV): a comparative analysis of clinical performance in cervical and urine samples in Chilean women.

Kurt Buchegger, Tamara Viscarra, Alejandra Andana, Carmen Ili, Jaime López, Louise Zanella, María Inés Carmona-López, Juan José Fernández, Irene Cartas Espinel, Raúl Sánchez and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kurt BucheggerLaboratory of Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Universidad de La Frontera Temuco, Chile.
Tamara ViscarraLaboratory of Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Universidad de La Frontera Temuco, Chile.
Alejandra AndanaLaboratory of Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Universidad de La Frontera Temuco, Chile.
Carmen IliLaboratory of Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Universidad de La Frontera Temuco, Chile.
Jaime LópezLaboratory of Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Universidad de La Frontera Temuco, Chile.
Louise ZanellaLaboratory of Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Universidad de La Frontera Temuco, Chile.
María Inés Carmona-LópezInstituto de Ciencias Biomédicas (ICBM) y Centro de Investigaciones Multidisciplinares de La Araucanía (CIMA) Universidad Autónoma de Chile.
Juan José FernándezInstituto de Ciencias Biomédicas (ICBM) y Centro de Investigaciones Multidisciplinares de La Araucanía (CIMA) Universidad Autónoma de Chile.
Irene Cartas EspinelLaboratory of Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Universidad de La Frontera Temuco, Chile.
Raúl SánchezCentro de Excelencia en Medicina Traslacional (CEMT), Universidad de La Frontera Casilla 54-D, Temuco, Chile.
Juan Carlos RoaDepartment of Pathology, UC Centre for Investigational Oncology (CITO), Advanced Centre for Chronic Diseases (ACCDiS), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago de Chile, Chile.
Priscilla BrebiLaboratory of Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Universidad de La Frontera Temuco, Chile.
Universidad de La Frontera · CLUniversidad Autónoma de Chile · CLPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infectious agent and is the main cause of cervical cancer (CC). In Chile, CC is the second leading cause of death by cancer in women aged 20-44 years, four times higher than in developed countries. Currently, the detection of HPV infection using a cervical brush is recommended; however, this is an invasive procedure that many women try to avoid. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of a self-collected, urine-based HPV detection method using conventional PCR followed by a reverse line blot. A PCR-based HPV genotyping was performed on 190 paired cervical and urine samples from gynecological exams at public health centers in the Araucania Region, Chile. HPV DNA detection and genotyping were performed by PCR and reverse line blot assay. Carcinogenic HPV types were present in 64.7% and 65.8% of the cervical and urine samples; the infection rates of HPV16 were 34.7% and 33.2%, respectively. The overall percent agreement between carcinogenic HPV detection in cervical and urine samples was 73.7%, with a moderate concordance rate of carcinogenic HPV detection (kappa = 0.42). Clinical sensitivities for cervical and urine-based sampling methods to diagnose cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3 (CIN2/3) by histology were 93.4% and 90.2%, respectively. These results suggest that both cervical brush and urine-based sampling show a good clinical performance in the detection of HPV infection. The urine-based sampling method represents a valuable alternative with a great impact on public health, allowing increased cervical cancer screening coverage among women who do not undergo pelvic examinations.

Indexed as

cervical cancercervical intraepithelial neoplasiaHuman papillomavirusurine-based sampling method

Identifiers

PMID31949624
PMCPMC6963012
OpenAlexW3004625217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.