Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31949341›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of radiology & imaging

The role of an IVC filter retrieval clinic-A single center retrospective analysis.

Philip A Schuchardt, Junaid T Yasin, Ryan M Davis, Sanjit O Tewari, Ambarish P Bhat

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of radiology & imaging. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Demystifying Sacral Masses: A Pictorial Review.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Philip A SchuchardtDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia 65212, MO, USA.
Junaid T YasinDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia 65212, MO, USA.
Ryan M DavisDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia 65212, MO, USA.
Sanjit O TewariDepartment of Interventional Radiology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse 13210, NY, USA.
Ambarish P BhatDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia 65212, MO, USA.
University of Missouri · USSUNY Upstate Medical University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement still plays an essential role in preventing pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with contraindications to anticoagulant therapy. However, IVC filter placement does have long-term risks which may be mitigated by retrieving them as soon as clinically acceptable. A dedicated IVC filter clinic provides a potential means of assuring adequate follow-up and retrieval.

aimTo assess the efficacy of our Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval clinic at improving the rate of patient follow-up, effective filter management, and retrieval rates. MATERIALS AND

methodsDuring the period of August 2017 through July 2018, 70 IVC filters were placed at our institution, and these patients were automatically enrolled into our IVC filter retrieval clinic for quarterly follow-up. We retrospectively reviewed data including appropriateness for removal at 3 months, overall retrieval rates, removal technique(s) employed, and technical success.

results62.9% of the potentially retrievable filters were removed during the study period. The technical success of extraction, using a combination of standard and advanced techniques, was 91.7%. Overall, 15% of the patients were lost to follow-up.

conclusionOur findings add to the growing body of literature to support the need for a robust IVC filter retrieval clinic to ensure adequate follow-up and timely retrieval of IVC filters.

Indexed as

AnticoagulationHangman techniqueIVC filterloop snarepulmonary embolismretrievalvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID31949341
PMCPMC6958892
OpenAlexW2996845767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.