Observational studySpinal cord2020
Plasma vitamin D, past chest illness, and risk of future chest illness in chronic spinal cord injury (SCI): a longitudinal observational study.
Observational study in Spinal cord, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of vitamin D on the prognosis after spinal cord injury: A systematic review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Pooled it
- 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels and Vitamin D3 Supplementation During Postacute Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2024Observational
- Prevalence of an insufficient vitamin D status at the onset of a spinal cord injury - a cross-sectional study.Spinal cord · 2023Article
- Vitamin D supplementation in chronic spinal cord injury (VitD-SCI): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Comment on: Plasma vitamin D, past chest illness, and risk of future chest illness in chronic spinal cord injury (SCI): a longitudinal observational study.Spinal cord · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
designObservational study.
objectiveAssess associations between vitamin D levels and other risk factors on future chest illness in a chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) cohort.
settingVeterans Affairs Boston and the Boston, MA community.
methodsBetween August 2009 and August 2017, 253 participants with chronic SCI were followed over a median of 3.2 years (up to 7.4 years) with two to four visits a median of 1.7 years apart. At each visit, plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D level was obtained, spirometry performed, and a respiratory questionnaire assessing chest illnesses since last visit was completed. Repeated measures negative binomial regression was used to assess chest illness risk longitudinally.
resultsAt entry, 25% had deficient vitamin D levels (<20 nanograms/milliliter (ng/ml)), 52% were insufficient (20 to <30 ng/ml), and 23% were sufficient (≥30 ng/ml). Over 545 study visits, chest illnesses (n = 106) were reported by 60 participants. In multivariable models (including previous chest illness history), deficient vitamin D levels (compared with those with sufficient levels) were associated with future chest illness though with wide confidence limits (relative risk (RR) = 1.36, 95% confidence intervals (CI) = 0.74, 2.47). The strongest association with chest illness during the follow-up period was in persons who reported pneumonia/bronchitis after injury and a chest illness in the three years before study entry (RR = 7.62; 95% CI = 3.70, 15.71).
conclusionAssessed prospectively in chronic SCI, there was a suggestive association between deficient vitamin D levels and future chest illness. Past chest illness history was also strongly associated with future chest illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.