Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31949241›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Quantitative analysis of Anaplasma marginale acquisition and transmission by Dermacentor andersoni fed in vitro.

Rubikah Vimonish, Wendell C Johnson, Michelle R Mousel, Kelly A Brayton, Glen A Scoles, Susan M Noh, Massaro W Ueti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Artificial Feeding of Hard Ticks Using Silicone Membranes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Artificial Feeding ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rubikah VimonishProgram in Vector-borne Diseases, Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, 99164, USA.
Wendell C JohnsonAnimal Diseases Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Pullman, Washington, 99164, USA.
Michelle R MouselAnimal Diseases Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Pullman, Washington, 99164, USA.
Kelly A BraytonProgram in Vector-borne Diseases, Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, 99164, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7077-5424
Glen A ScolesAnimal Diseases Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Pullman, Washington, 99164, USA.
Susan M NohProgram in Vector-borne Diseases, Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, 99164, USA. susan.noh@usda.gov.
Massaro W UetiProgram in Vector-borne Diseases, Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, 99164, USA. massaro.ueti@usda.gov.
Washington State University · USAgricultural Research Service · USBiocon (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we describe a new in vitro tick feeding system that facilitates the study of ticks and tick-borne pathogens. To optimize the system, we used Dermacentor andersoni and Anaplasma marginale as a tick-pathogen interaction model. Ticks were fed on bovine blood containing 10-fold dilutions of the pathogen to determine the effect of dose on tick infection rate. After feeding on infected blood, ticks were transferred to uninfected blood to stimulate bacterial replication within the tick vector. During stimulation feeding, blood samples were collected daily to determine if infected ticks secreted viable A. marginale. The results demonstrated similar attachment rates between the first and second tick feeding. Tick midgut and salivary glands were infected with A. marginale. However, salivary gland infection rates decreased as the percentage of parasitized erythrocytes decreased during tick acquisition feeding. Bacteria recovered from the in vitro system were able to infect a naïve bovine host. Using the highly transmissible A. marginale St. Maries strain, we demonstrated that the artificial tick feeding system is a suitable tool to study tick-pathogen interactions and that A. marginale tick salivary gland infection is dose dependent. This work demonstrates the utility of an artificial tick feeding system to directly study the association between the number of acquired pathogens and transmissibility by ticks.

Indexed as

Anaplasma marginaleAnaplasmataceae InfectionsAnimalsArachnid VectorsCattleCattle DiseasesDermacentorDigestive SystemFeeding BehaviorSalivary GlandsTick Infestations

Identifiers

PMID31949241
PMCPMC6965182
OpenAlexW2999214701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.