ArticleScientific reports2020
Biodegradability of woody film produced by solvent volatilisation of Japanese Beech solution.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rumen-Protected Glucose Supplementation Enhances Yak Calf Growth Through Gut Microbiota-Metabolic Interactions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Effects of Deep Tillage on Rhizosphere Soil and Microorganisms During Wheat Cultivation.Microorganisms · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the problem of marine pollution from discarded plastics, we developed a highly biodegradable woody film, with almost the same components as wood, from the formic acid solution of ball-milled wood. We found that the woody film was not easily degraded by cultured solution of hand bacteria (phylum Proteobacteria was dominant). However, the film was easily biodegraded when in cultured solution of soil (Firmicutes, especially class Bacilli, was dominant) for 4 weeks at 37 °C, or when buried in the soil itself, both under aerobic conditions (Acidobacteria and Proteobacteria were dominant) for 40 days at room temperature and under anaerobic conditions (Firmicutes, especially family Ruminococcaceae, was dominant) for 5 weeks at 37 °C. Moreover, when film was buried in the soil, more carbon dioxide was generated than from soil alone. Therefore, the film was not only brittle but formed of decomposable organic matter. We showed that the film does not decompose at the time of use when touched by the hand, but it decomposes easily when buried in the soil after use. We suggest that this biodegradable woody film can be used as a sustainable raw material in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.