Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31948998›Full record

ReviewCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2020

Conceptualizing Health Behaviors as Acute Mood-Altering Agents: Implications for Cancer Control.

Genevieve F Dunton, Jonas T Kaplan, John Monterosso, Raina D Pang, Tyler B Mason, Matthew G Kirkpatrick, Sandrah P Eckel, Adam M Leventhal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Delineating the role of binge eating in cancer research.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Genevieve F DuntonDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California. dunton@usc.edu.
Jonas T KaplanDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
John MonterossoDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Raina D PangDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Tyler B MasonDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0001-7284-7890
Matthew G KirkpatrickDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Sandrah P EckelDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Adam M LeventhalDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES007048 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ROB S MCCONNELL · 1996 to 2026
$46.4M
Novel Statistical Models for Intensive Longitudinal Analyses of Cancer Control BehaviorsR01CA240713 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Genevieve Fridlund Dunton, Donald Hedeker · 2019 to 2026
$4.1M
Maternal Stress and Children's Obesity RiskR01HL119255 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI DUNTON, GENEVIEVE FRIDLUND · 2013 to 2017
$4.0M
Microtemporal Processes Underlying Health Behavior Adoption and MaintenanceU01HL146327 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI DUNTON, GENEVIEVE FRIDLUND, INTILLE, STEPHEN S · 2018 to 2022
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240713NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL119255NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL146327NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES007048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A massive portion of cancer burden is accounted for by a small collection of highly prevalent cancer risk behaviors (e.g., low physical activity, unhealthy diet, and tobacco use). Why people engage in numerous types of cancer risk behaviors and fail to adopt various cancer prevention behaviors has been poorly understood. In this commentary, we propose a novel scientific framework, which argues that a common affective (i.e., emotion based) mechanism underpins a diversity of such cancer risk and prevention behaviors. The scientific premise is that cancer risk and prevention behaviors produce immediate and robust changes in affective states that are translated into motivations and drives, which promote further pursuit of risk behaviors or avoidance of prevention behaviors. After describing the conceptual and scientific basis for this framework, we then propose central research questions that can address the validity and utility of the framework. Next, we selectively review and integrate findings on the mood-altering effects of various cancer risk and prevention behaviors from the addiction science, exercise science, and behavioral nutrition literatures, focusing on the nature and phenomenology of behavior-elicited mood changes and their value for predicting future behavior change. We conclude by discussing how this framework can be applied to address critical scientific questions in cancer control.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth BehaviorAntidepressive AgentsBehavior TherapyDietHumansMood DisordersNeoplasmsSmokingSmoking CessationAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID31948998
PMCPMC7158868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.