Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31948542›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

The Norway rat, from an obnoxious pest to a laboratory pet.

Klaudia Modlinska, Wojciech Pisula

Open access · goldAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Occupational Allergy to Rat and Mouse in Research Laboratories.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Rat Models of Breast Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Klaudia ModlinskaInstitute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warszawa, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2161-9019
Wojciech PisulaInstitute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warszawa, Poland.
Institute of Psychology · PL

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki UMO-2015/19/D/HS6/00781
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The laboratory rat was the first mammal domesticated for research purposes. It is descended from wild Norway rats,

Indexed as

Animals, LaboratoryAnimals, WildRatsAnimalsBiomedical ResearchFemaleHistory, 20th CenturyMaledomesticationecologyevolutionary biologylaboratory ratmodel organismratRattus norvegicuswild rat

Identifiers

PMID31948542
PMCPMC6968928
OpenAlexW3000441139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.