Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31948459›Full record

ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2020

The complex microbiome from native semen to embryo culture environment in human in vitro fertilization procedure.

Jelena Štšepetova, Juliana Baranova, Jaak Simm, Ülle Parm, Tiiu Rööp, Sandra Sokmann, Paul Korrovits, Madis Jaagura, Karin Rosenstein, Andres Salumets and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Semen Microbiome, Male Infertility, and Reproductive Health.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Human Male Genital Tract Microbiota.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Jelena ŠtšepetovaInstitute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, Department of Microbiology, University of Tartu, Ravila 19, 50411, Tartu, Estonia. jelena.stsepetova@ut.ee.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6216-1243
Juliana BaranovaInstitute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, Department of Microbiology, University of Tartu, Ravila 19, 50411, Tartu, Estonia.
Jaak SimmDepartment of Gene Technology, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086, Tallinn, Estonia.
Ülle ParmInstitute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, Department of Microbiology, University of Tartu, Ravila 19, 50411, Tartu, Estonia.
Tiiu RööpInstitute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, Department of Microbiology, University of Tartu, Ravila 19, 50411, Tartu, Estonia.
Sandra SokmannInstitute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, Department of Microbiology, University of Tartu, Ravila 19, 50411, Tartu, Estonia.
Paul KorrovitsInstitute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, Department of Microbiology, University of Tartu, Ravila 19, 50411, Tartu, Estonia.
Madis JaaguraNovaVita Clinic, Tammsaare tee 47, 11316, Tallinn, Estonia.
Karin RosensteinNovaVita Clinic, Tammsaare tee 47, 11316, Tallinn, Estonia.
Andres SalumetsCompetence Centre on Health Technologies, Tiigi 61B, 50410, Tartu, Estonia.
Reet MändarInstitute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, Department of Microbiology, University of Tartu, Ravila 19, 50411, Tartu, Estonia.
University of Tartu · EECompetence Centre on Health Technologies (Estonia) · EETallinn University of Technology · EETartu Health Care College · EETartu University Hospital · EEUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

Enterprise Estonia EU48695Estonian Ministry of Education and Research KOGU-HUMBEstonian Research Competency Council IUT34-19, UIT-34-16Horizon 2020 Framework Programme WIDEENLIFE, 692065; MSCA-RISE-2015, MOMENDO 691058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnly a few microbial studies have conducted in IVF (in vitro fertilization), showing the high-variety bacterial contamination of IVF culture media to cause damage to or even loss of cultured oocytes and embryos. We aimed to determine the prevalence and counts of bacteria in IVF samples, and to associate them with clinical outcome.

methodsThe studied samples from 50 infertile couples included: raw (n = 48), processed (n = 49) and incubated (n = 50) sperm samples, and IVF culture media (n = 50). The full microbiome was analyzed by 454 pyrosequencing and quantitative analysis by real-time quantitative PCR. Descriptive statistics, t-, Mann-Whitney tests and Spearman's correlation were used for comparison of studied groups.

resultsThe study involved normozoospermic men. Normal vaginal microbiota was present in 72.0% of female partners, while intermediate microbiota and bacterial vaginosis were diagnosed in 12.0 and 16.0%, respectively. The decreasing bacterial loads were found in raw (35.5%), processed (12.0%) and sperm samples used for oocyte insemination (4.0%), and in 8.0% of IVF culture media. The most abundant genera of bacteria in native semen and IVF culture media were Lactobacillus, while in other samples Alphaproteobacteria prevailed. Staphylococcus sp. was found only in semen from patients with inflammation. Phylum Bacteroidetes was in negative correlation with sperm motility and Alphaproteobacteria with high-quality IVF embryos.

conclusionOur study demonstrates that IVF does not occur in a sterile environment. The prevalent bacteria include classes Bacilli in raw semen and IVF culture media, Clostridia in processed and Bacteroidia in sperm samples used for insemination. The presence of Staphylococcus sp. and Alphaproteobacteria associated with clinical outcomes, like sperm and embryo quality.

Indexed as

AdultCulture MediaEmbryo Culture TechniquesEscherichia coliFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansMaleMicrobiotaSemenSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicStaphylococcusCulture MediaBacteriaContaminationInfertilityIn vitro fertilization (IVF)Sperm microbiota

Identifiers

PMID31948459
PMCPMC6966866
OpenAlexW3005998500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.