Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31948387›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2020

Orthopaedic surgeons' perceptions of frailty and frailty screening.

Mandy M Archibald, Michael Lawless, Tiffany K Gill, Mellick J Chehade

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Predictive ability of frailty scores in surgically managed patients with traumatic spinal injuries: a TQIP analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Identifying and Managing Frailty: A Survey of UK Healthcare Professionals.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mandy M Archibaldfor the Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty and Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, Australia. mandy.archibald@umanitoba.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-4767-1031
Michael Lawlessfor the Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty and Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, Australia.
Tiffany K GillAdelaide Medical School, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Level 7, North Tce, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Mellick J Chehadefor the Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty and Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, Australia.
Flinders University · AURoyal Adelaide Hospital · AUSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1102208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the past decade, there has been significant growth in the awareness and understanding of fragility among orthopaedic surgeons in the context of osteoporotic fractures and with it, improvements in the recognition and management of fragility fractures. Emerging as a major clinical and research focus in aged care is the concept of frailty and its associations with fragility, sarcopenia, falls and rehabilitation. Currently, research is lacking on how orthopaedic surgeons perceive frailty and the role of frailty screening. A baseline understanding of these perceptions is needed to inform integration of frailty identification and management for patient optimization in orthopaedic practices, as well as research and education efforts of patients and healthcare professionals in orthopaedic contexts.

methodsWe used an exploratory design guided by qualitative description to conduct 15 semi-structured telephone and in-person interviews across three orthopaedic surgeon subgroups (Registrars, Junior Consultants, and Senior Consultants). Data collection and analysis occurred iteratively and was guided by thematic saturation.

resultsOrthopaedic surgeons have a disparate understanding of frailty. Between colleagues, frailty is often referred to non-specifically to suggest a general state of risk to the patient. Frailty screening is regarded positively but its specific utility in orthopaedic environments is questioned. Easy-to-administer frailty screening tools that are not exclusive assessments of functional status are viewed most satisfactorily. However these tools are rarely used.

conclusionsThere is little understanding among orthopaedic surgeons of frailty as a phenotype. Beliefs around modifiability of frailty were dissimilar as were the impact of related risk factors, such a cognitive status, chronic disease, social isolation, and environmental influences. This in turn may significantly impact on the occurrence and treatment outcomes of fragility fracture, a common orthopaedic problem in older populations. This study highlights need for knowledge translation efforts (e.g. education) to achieve cohesive understanding of frailty among health professionals.

Indexed as

FrailtyOrthopedicsOrthopedic SurgeonsOsteoporotic FracturesAgedHumansMass ScreeningFragilityFrailtyFrailty screeningOrthopedicsQualitative

Identifiers

PMID31948387
PMCPMC6966824
OpenAlexW3000441824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.