Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31947902›Full record

ArticlePolymers2020

Porcine Collagen-Bone Composite Induced Osteoblast Differentiation and Bone Regeneration In Vitro and In Vivo.

Eisner Salamanca, Chia Chen Hsu, Wan Ling Yao, Cheuk Sing Choy, Yu Hwa Pan, Nai-Chia Teng, Wei-Jen Chang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Strategies for Bone Regeneration: From Graft to Tissue Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Eisner SalamancaSchool of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan.
Chia Chen HsuSchool of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan.
Wan Ling YaoSchool of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6193-9247
Cheuk Sing ChoyDepartment of Community Medicine, En Chu Kong Hospital, New Taipei City 237, Taiwan.
Yu Hwa PanSchool of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan.
Nai-Chia TengSchool of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan.
Wei-Jen ChangSchool of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan.
Taipei Medical University · TWTaipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital · TWChang Gung University · TWTaipei Medical University Hospital · TWYuanpei University · TW

Funding

Council of Agriculture 107AS-1.2.5-ST-a5En Chu Kong Hospital ECKHW10713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to autogenous bone limitations, some substitute bone grafts were developed. Collagenated porcine graft (CPG) is able to regenerate new bone, although the number of studies is insufficient, highlighting the need for future studies to better understand the biomaterial. In order to understand better CPG's possible dental guided bone regeneration indications, the aim of this work was to determine CPG's biological capacity to induce osteoblast differentiation in vitro and guided bone regeneration in vivo, whilst being compared with commercial hydroxyapatite and beta tricalcium phosphate (HA/β-TCP) and porcine graft alone. Cell cytotoxicity (WST-1), alkaline phosphatase activity (ALP), and real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) were assessed in vitro. Critical size defects of New Zealand white rabbits were used for the in vivo part, with critical size defect closures and histological analyses. WST-1 and ALP indicated that CPG directly stimulated a greater proliferation and confluency of cells with osteoblastic differentiation in vitro. Gene sequencing indicated stable bone formation markers, decreased resorption makers, and bone remodeling coupling factors, making the transition from osteoclast to osteoblast expression at the end of seven days. CPG resulted in the highest new bone regeneration by osteoconduction in critical size defects of rabbit calvaria at eight weeks. Nonetheless, all biomaterials achieved nearly complete calvaria defect closure. CPG was found to be osteoconductive, like porcine graft and HA/β-TCP, but with higher new bone formation in critical size defects of rabbit calvaria at eight weeks. CPG can be used for different dental guided bone regeneration procedures; however, further studies are necessary.

Indexed as

biological apatitechemical propertiescollagen type Iporcine graft

Identifiers

PMID31947902
PMCPMC7023633
OpenAlexW2998382435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.