Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31947887›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Structural Characterization of the CD44 Stem Region for Standard and Cancer-Associated Isoforms.

Kun-Lin Chen, Deng Li, Ting-Xuan Lu, Shu-Wei Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Encoding Cell-Surface Receptor Function Through Glycosylation: Lessons From CD44.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. CD44 variant exons induce chemoresistance by modulating cell death pathways.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. A Novel Anti-CD44 Variant 9 Monoclonal Antibody CCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Article
  14. Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kun-Lin ChenDepartment of Engineering Science and Ocean Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
Deng LiDepartment of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
Ting-Xuan LuDepartment and Graduate Institute of Pharmacology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
Shu-Wei ChangDepartment of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 108-2218-E-007- 037Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 108-2636-E-002-016National Taiwan University 107L891102National Taiwan University 108L891102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CD44 is widely expressed in most vertebrate cells, whereas the expression of CD44v6 is restricted to only a few tissues and has been considered to be associated with tumor progression and metastasis. Thus, CD44v6 has been recognized as a promising prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target for various cancers for more than a decade. However, despite many experimental studies, the structural dynamics and differences between CD44s and CD44v6, particularly in their stem region, still remain elusive. Here, a computational study was conducted to address these problems. We found that the stem of CD44s adopted predominantly two conformations, one featuring antiparallel β-sheets and the other featuring parallel β-sheets, whereas the stem of CD44v6 adopted mainly one conformation with relatively highly suppressed β-sheet contents. Moreover, Phe215 was found to be essential in the β-sheets of both CD44s and CD44v6. We finally found intramolecular Phe215-Trp224 hydrogen-bonding interactions and hydrophobic interactions with Phe215 that cooperatively drove conformational differences upon the addition of the v6 region to CD44. Our study elucidated the structural differences between the stem regions of CD44s and CD44v6 and thus can offer useful structural information for drug design to specifically target CD44v6 in promising clinical applications.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsHydrogen BondingHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMolecular Dynamics SimulationNeoplasmsProtein ConformationProtein Conformation, beta-StrandProtein IsoformsRatsCD44 protein, humanHyaluronan ReceptorsProtein IsoformsCD44CD44v6metastasismolecular dynamics simulationsreceptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)tumor progressionβ-sheets

Identifiers

PMID31947887
PMCPMC6982006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.