Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31947854›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2020

The Role of Trust in Explaining Food Choice: Combining Choice Experiment and Attribute Best-Worst Scaling.

Ching-Hua Yeh, Monika Hartmann, Nina Langen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ching-Hua YehDepartment of Agricultural and Food Market Research, Institute for Food and Resource Economics, University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany.
Monika HartmannDepartment of Agricultural and Food Market Research, Institute for Food and Resource Economics, University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany.
Nina LangenDepartment of Education for Sustainable Nutrition and Food Science, Institute of Vocational Education and Work Studies, Technical University of Berlin, 10587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7690-2276

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents empirical findings from a combination of two elicitation techniques-discrete choice experiment (DCE) and best-worst scaling (BWS)-to provide information about the role of consumers' trust in food choice decisions in the case of credence attributes. The analysis was based on a sample of 459 Taiwanese consumers and focuses on red sweet peppers. DCE data were examined using latent class analysis to investigate the importance and the utility different consumer segments attach to the production method, country of origin, and chemical residue testing. The relevance of attitudinal and trust-based items was identified by BWS using a hierarchical Bayesian mixed logit model and was aggregated to five latent components by means of principal component analysis. Applying a multinomial logit model, participants' latent class membership (obtained from DCE data) was regressed on the identified attitudinal and trust components, as well as demographic information. Results of the DCE latent class analysis for the product attributes show that four segments may be distinguished. Linking the DCE with the attitudinal dimensions reveals that consumers' attitude and trust significantly explain class membership and therefore, consumers' preferences for different credence attributes. Based on our results, we derive recommendations for industry and policy.

Indexed as

best-worst scalingchoice experimenthierarchical Bayesian mixed logit modellatent class analysispreferencetrust

Identifiers

PMID31947854
PMCPMC7023131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.