ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Nanotechnology Scaffolds for Alveolar Bone Regeneration.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.
- Would Exosome Therapy be Effective for Bone Regeneration? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Calcified tissue international · 2025Pooled it
- Alveolar Bone Regeneration: Smart Biomaterials and Physical Stimulation.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2026Review
- Evaluation of poly-ε-caprolactone/graphene oxide three-dimensional porous scaffolds for potential application in alveolar bone repair.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
- Characterization of bovine-teeth nanoparticles and its effect on BMP-2 expression in periodontitis rat model.Brazilian oral research · 2026Article
- Construction ofRegenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- Updates on Bone Grafts and Substitutes.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2025Article
- [Updates on Bone Grafts and Substitutes].Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2025Article
- Hydrogel-Based Therapeutic Strategies for Periodontal Tissue Regeneration: Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Next-Generation Natural Hydrogels in Oral Tissue Engineering.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Advances in Local Drug Delivery for Periodontal Treatment: Present Strategies and Future Directions.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- A deformable SIS/HA composite hydrogel coaxial scaffold promotes alveolar bone regeneration after tooth extraction.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Nano-scaffold-based delivery systems of antimicrobial agents in the treatment of osteomyelitis ; a narrative review.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Dual nanofiber and graphene reinforcement of 3D printed biomimetic supports for bone tissue repair.RSC advances · 2024Article
- Nanoparticles in Bone Regeneration: A Narrative Review of Current Advances and Future Directions in Tissue Engineering.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Review
- In Vitro Biocompatibility Assessment of Bioengineered PLA-Hydrogel Core-Shell Scaffolds with Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Bone Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
- The Applicability of Nanostructured Materials in Regenerating Soft and Bone Tissue in the Oral Cavity-A Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Recent Advances in Scaffolds for Guided Bone Regeneration.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Effect of chitosan/dioleyl phosphatidyl ethanolamine - Baicalein nanohydrogel in the treatment of rat with periodontitis.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Resorbable GBR Scaffolds in Oral and Maxillofacial Tissue Engineering: Design, Fabrication, and Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Advancing Dentistry through Bioprinting: Personalization of Oral Tissues.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In oral biology, tissue engineering aims at regenerating functional tissues through a series of key events that occur during alveolar/periodontal tissue formation and growth, by means of scaffolds that deliver signaling molecules and cells. Due to their excellent physicochemical properties and biomimetic features, nanomaterials are attractive alternatives offering many advantages for stimulating cell growth and promoting tissue regeneration through tissue engineering. The main aim of this article was to review the currently available literature to provide an overview of the different nano-scale scaffolds as key factors of tissue engineering for alveolar bone regeneration procedures. In this narrative review, PubMed, Medline, Scopus and Cochrane electronic databases were searched using key words like "tissue engineering", "regenerative medicine", "alveolar bone defects", "alveolar bone regeneration", "nanomaterials", "scaffolds", "nanospheres" and "nanofibrous scaffolds". No limitation regarding language, publication date and study design was set. Hand-searching of the reference list of identified articles was also undertaken. The aim of this article was to give a brief introduction to review the role of different nanoscaffolds for bone regeneration and the main focus was set to underline their role for alveolar bone regeneration procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.