Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31947650›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Degenerated Cones in Cultured Human Retinas Can Successfully Be Optogenetically Reactivated.

Sizar Kamar, Marcus H C Howlett, Jan Klooster, Wim de Graaff, Tamás Csikós, Martijn J W E Rabelink, Rob C Hoeben, Maarten Kamermans

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Optogenetic Vision Restoration.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sizar KamarNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, 1105 BA Amsterdam-Zuidoost, The Netherlands.
Marcus H C HowlettNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, 1105 BA Amsterdam-Zuidoost, The Netherlands.
Jan KloosterNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, 1105 BA Amsterdam-Zuidoost, The Netherlands.
Wim de GraaffNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, 1105 BA Amsterdam-Zuidoost, The Netherlands.
Tamás CsikósNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, 1105 BA Amsterdam-Zuidoost, The Netherlands.
Martijn J W E RabelinkDepartment of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rob C HoebenDepartment of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Maarten KamermansNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, 1105 BA Amsterdam-Zuidoost, The Netherlands.
Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

Friendsfoundation NIN Publication grantNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Mosaic 017.008.115Uitzicht 2016-13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biblical references aside, restoring vision to the blind has proven to be a major technical challenge. In recent years, considerable advances have been made towards this end, especially when retinal degeneration underlies the vision loss such as occurs with retinitis pigmentosa. Under these conditions, optogenetic therapies are a particularly promising line of inquiry where remaining retinal cells are made into "artificial photoreceptors". However, this strategy is not without its challenges and a model system using human retinal explants would aid its continued development and refinement. Here, we cultured post-mortem human retinas and show that explants remain viable for around 7 days. Within this period, the cones lose their outer segments and thus their light sensitivity but remain electrophysiologically intact, displaying all the major ionic conductances one would expect for a vertebrate cone. We optogenetically restored light responses to these quiescent cones using a lentivirus vector constructed to express enhanced halorhodopsin under the control of the human arrestin promotor. In these 'reactivated' retinas, we show a light-induced horizontal cell to cone feedback signal in cones, indicating that transduced cones were able to transmit their light response across the synapse to horizontal cells, which generated a large enough response to send a signal back to the cones. Furthermore, we show ganglion cell light responses, suggesting the cultured explant's condition is still good enough to support transmission of the transduced cone signal over the intermediate retinal layers to the final retinal output level. Together, these results show that cultured human retinas are an appropriate model system to test optogenetic vision restoration approaches and that cones which have lost their outer segment, a condition occurring during the early stages of retinitis pigmentosa, are appropriate targets for optogenetic vision restoration therapies.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkersCalcium SignalingCells, CulturedElectroretinographyFemaleGene ExpressionGenetic VectorsHumansImmunohistochemistryIon ChannelsLentivirusMaleMiddle AgedOptogeneticsBiomarkersIon Channelscone photoreceptorscultured human retinaoptogeneticsretinitis pigmentosavision restoration

Identifiers

PMID31947650
PMCPMC7014344
OpenAlexW2999473979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.