Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31947649›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Phytotoxic Activity and Identification of Phytotoxic Substances from

Md Mahfuzur Rob, Kawsar Hossen, Arihiro Iwasaki, Kiyotake Suenaga, Hisashi Kato-Noguchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Phytotoxicity of Chemical Compounds fromInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Monoterpenes and Sesquiterpenes of Essential Oils fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Allelopathic Potential and Active Substances fromFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  18. Allelopathic Potential of Aqueous Extract fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Md Mahfuzur RobDepartment of Applied Biological Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kagawa University, Miki, Kagawa 761-0795, Japan.
Kawsar HossenDepartment of Applied Biological Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kagawa University, Miki, Kagawa 761-0795, Japan.
Arihiro IwasakiDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku, Yokohama 223-8522, Japan.
Kiyotake SuenagaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku, Yokohama 223-8522, Japan.
Hisashi Kato-NoguchiDepartment of Applied Biological Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kagawa University, Miki, Kagawa 761-0795, Japan.

Funding

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, japan 173591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phytotoxic potential of plants and their constituents against other plants is being increasingly investigated as a possible alternative to synthetic herbicides to control weeds in crop fields. In this study, we explored the phytotoxicity and phytotoxic substances of

Indexed as

growth inhibitionmethyl syringatephytotoxic substancesSchumannianthus dichotomussyringic acid

Identifiers

PMID31947649
PMCPMC7020185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.