ArticleGenes2020
Identification of a Novel Imprinted Transcript in the Porcine
Article in Genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conservation and divergence of canonical and non-canonical imprinting in murids.Genome biology · 2023Pooled it
- Genomic imprinting at a porcine ZNF locus via a canonical imprinting mechanism.Animal genetics · 2025Article
- Short Communication: The imprinted and paternally expressed MIMT1 lncRNA ortholog in pigs.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Evolutionary lineage-specific genomic imprinting at the ZNF791 locus.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- The AIRN lncRNA is imprinted and paternally expressed in pigs.Journal of animal science · 2023Article
- Comparative maternal protein profiling of mouse biparental and uniparental embryos.GigaScience · 2022Article
- Loss of Monoallelic Expression ofFrontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Genomic Imprinting at the PorcineAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Genomic Imprinting at the PorcineGenes · 2021Article
- The Landscape of Genomic Imprinting at the PorcineG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- Developmental and Degenerative Characterization of Porcine Parthenogenetic Fetuses during Early Pregnancy.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic imprinting in domestic animals contributes to the variance of performance traits. However, research remains to be done on large-scale detection of epigenetic landscape of porcine imprinted loci including the GNAS complex locus. The purpose of this study was to generate porcine parthenogenetic fetuses and comprehensively identify imprinting patterns of the GNAS locus in transcript levels. To this end, both normally fertilized and bimaternal (uniparental) parthenogenetic porcine fetuses were generated, and whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) were performed to construct methylome and transcriptome, respectively. Differentially methylated regions (DMRs) between the fetuses were identified through methylome analysis, and parental-origin-specific expression patterns of transcripts were examined with transcriptome. As a result, three major DMRs were identified: paternally methylated
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.