Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31947598›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Outcomes of Capecitabine and Temozolomide (CAPTEM) in Advanced Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NENs).

Katharine Thomas, Brianne A Voros, Meghan Meadows-Taylor, Matthew P Smeltzer, Ryan Griffin, J Philip Boudreaux, Ramcharan Thiagarajan, Eugene A Woltering, Robert A Ramirez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Management of typical and atypical metastatic lung carcinoids: present and future perspectives.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Radioligand Therapy with [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. A Phase II Clinical Trial of Nivolumab and Temozolomide for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katharine ThomasDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Louisiana State University Health Science Center, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Brianne A VorosDepartment of Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Meghan Meadows-TaylorDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Memphis School of Public Health, Memphis, TN 20910, USA.
Matthew P SmeltzerDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Memphis School of Public Health, Memphis, TN 20910, USA.
Ryan GriffinOchsner Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, New Orleans, LA 70122, USA.
J Philip BoudreauxDepartment of Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Ramcharan ThiagarajanDepartment of Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Eugene A WolteringDepartment of Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Robert A RamirezOchsner Medical Center-Kenner, Neuroendocrine Tumor Clinic, Kenner, LA 70065, USA.
Ochsner Medical Center · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USUniversity of Memphis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM) have shown promising results in the treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome and role for CAPTEM in malignant neuroendocrine neoplasms. Data were obtained from NEN patients who received at least one cycle of CAPTEM between November 2010 and June 2018. The average number of cycles was 9.5. For analysis, 116 patients were included, of which 105 patients (91%) underwent prior treatment. Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 13 and 38 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 21%. Disease control rate (DCR) was 73% in all patients. PFS, median OS, ORR, and DCR for pancreatic NENs (pNEN) vs. non-pNEN was 29 vs. 11 months, 35 vs. 38 months, 38% vs. 9%, and 77% vs. 71%, respectively. Patients with pNEN had a 50% lower hazard of disease progression compared to those with non-pNEN (adjusted Hazard Ratio: 0.498,

Indexed as

Capecitabinechemotherapyneuroendocrine neoplasmstemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID31947598
PMCPMC7017154
OpenAlexW3000533041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.