Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31946857›Full record

ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2019

A Cloud-based Framework for Implementing Portable Machine Learning Pipelines for Neural Data Analysis.

Charles A Ellis, Ping Gu, Mohammad S E Sendi, Daniel Huddleston, Ashish Sharma, Babak Mahmoudi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Charles A Ellis
Ping Gu
Mohammad S E Sendi
Daniel Huddleston
Ashish Sharma
Babak Mahmoudi
Emory University · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · USThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering · US

Funding

MRI Signatures of Neuromelanin and Iron Pathology in ParkinsonismK23NS105944 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HUDDLESTON, DANIEL · 2018 to 2022
$963k
NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS105944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cloud-based computing has created new avenues for innovative research. In recent years, numerous cloud-based, data analysis projects within the biomedical domain have been implemented. As this field is likely to grow, there is a need for a unified platform for the developing and testing of advanced analytic and modeling tools that enables those tools to be easily reused for biomedical data analysis by a broad set of users with diverse technical skills. A cloud-based platform of this nature could greatly assist future research endeavors. In this paper, we take the first step towards building such a platform. We define an approach by which containerized analytic pipelines can be distributed for use on cloud-based or on-premise computing platforms. We demonstrate our approach by implementing a portable biomarker identification pipeline using a logistic regression model with elastic net regularization (LR-ENR) and running it on Google Cloud. We used this pipeline for the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease based on a combination of clinical, demographic, and MRI-based features and for the identification of the most predictive biomarkers.

Indexed as

Cloud ComputingComputational BiologyData AnalysisSoftwareMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID31946857
PMCPMC7390749
OpenAlexW2980042205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.