Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31946435›Full record

ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2019

Automatic Artifact Detection in Impedance Cardiogram Using Pulse Similarity Index.

Mohamad Forouzanfar, Fiona C Baker, Ian M Colrain, Massimiliano de Zambotti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohamad Forouzanfar
Fiona C Baker
Ian M Colrain
Massimiliano de Zambotti

Funding

Sleep and Cardiovascular Health in AdolescenceR01HL139652 · NHLBI · SRI INTERNATIONAL · PI DE ZAMBOTTI, MASSIMILIANO · 2018 to 2021
$2.9M
Alcohol, Sleep, and Autonomic Nervous System FunctionR21AA024841 · NIAAA · SRI INTERNATIONAL · PI COLRAIN, IAN MICHAEL, DE ZAMBOTTI, MASSIMILIANO · 2016 to 2017
$560k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL139652NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA024841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impedance cardiography (ICG) is a noninvasive technique for evaluation of cardiac hemodynamic parameters such as cardiac output and pre-ejection period. However, the sensitivity of the technique to motion artifact, electrode displacement, and cardiovascular pathologies can severely impact the accuracy of hemodynamic parameter estimates. In this paper, we proposed a new algorithm for the automatic detection and exclusion of corrupted ICG cardiac cycles by defining a pulse similarity index that quantifies the level of pulse corruption and its diversion from a typical-shaped pulse. The index considers different features (activity, structure, shape, and pattern) of the ICG cardiac cycles. The algorithm is compared on sleep data collected from 20 participants against expert identified corrupted cycles. The artifact rejection algorithm achieved a high accuracy of 96% in detection of expert-identified corrupted ICG cycles, including those with normal amplitude as well as out-of-range values, and was robust to different types and levels of artifact. The algorithm shows promise toward applications requiring accurate and reliable automatic measurement of cardiac hemodynamic parameters from prolonged data sets.

Indexed as

ArtifactsCardiography, ImpedancePulseAlgorithmsCardiac OutputElectric ImpedanceHumans

Identifiers

PMID31946435
PMCPMC7477892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.