Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31945138›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Cytoplasmic factories, virus assembly, and DNA replication kinetics collectively constrain the formation of poxvirus recombinants.

Quinten Kieser, Ryan S Noyce, Mira Shenouda, Y-C James Lin, David H Evans

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The Biology of Nucleus-Forming Jumbo Phages.Annual review of genetics · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Monkeypox Virus (MPXV) Infection: A Review.Infectious disorders drug targets · 2024
    Review
  10. Mpox (formerly monkeypox): pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Monkeypox virus: A review.Microbial pathogenesis · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Quinten KieserThe Dept. of Medical Microbiology & Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Ryan S NoyceThe Dept. of Medical Microbiology & Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Mira ShenoudaThe Dept. of Medical Microbiology & Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Y-C James LinThe Dept. of Medical Microbiology & Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
David H EvansThe Dept. of Medical Microbiology & Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5871-299X
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

CIHR PS 159614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poxviruses replicate in cytoplasmic structures called factories and each factory begins as a single infecting particle. Sixty-years ago Cairns predicted that this might have effects on vaccinia virus (VACV) recombination because the factories would have to collide and mix their contents to permit recombination. We've since shown that factories collide irregularly and that even then the viroplasm mixes poorly. We've also observed that while intragenic recombination occurs frequently early in infection, intergenic recombination is less efficient and happens late in infection. Something inhibits factory fusion and viroplasm mixing but what is unclear. To study this, we've used optical and electron microscopy to track factory movement in co-infected cells and correlate these observations with virus development and recombinant formation. While the technical complexity of the experiments limited the number of cells that are amenable to extensive statistical analysis, these studies do show that intergenic recombination coincides with virion assembly and when VACV replication has declined to ≤10% of earlier levels. Along the boundaries between colliding factories, one sees ER membrane remnants and other cell constituents like mitochondria. These collisions don't always cause factory fusion, but when factories do fuse, they still entrain cell constituents like mitochondria and ER-wrapped microtubules. However, these materials wouldn't seem to pose much of a further barrier to DNA mixing and so it's likely that the viroplasm also presents an omnipresent impediment to DNA mixing. Late packaging reactions might help to disrupt the viroplasm, but packaging would sequester the DNA just as the replication and recombination machinery goes into decline and further reduce recombinant yields. Many factors thus appear to conspire to limit recombination between co-infecting poxviruses.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationRecombination, GeneticVaccinia virusVirus AssemblyAnimalsCell LineCytosolDNA, ViralEndoplasmic ReticulumVirionDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID31945138
PMCPMC6964908
OpenAlexW2999373107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.