Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31945083›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

The evolution of secondary flow phenomena and their effect on primary shock conditions in shock tubes: Experimentation and numerical model.

Sudeepto Kahali, Molly Townsend, Melissa Mendez Nguyen, Jeffrey Kim, Eren Alay, Maciej Skotak, Namas Chandra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sudeepto KahaliDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8675-7466
Molly TownsendDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America.
Melissa Mendez NguyenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America.
Jeffrey KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America.
Eren AlayDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America.
Maciej SkotakDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America.
Namas ChandraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4770-1002
New Jersey Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compressed gas-driven shock tubes are widely used for laboratory simulation of primary blasts by accurately replicating pressure profiles measured in live-fire explosions. These investigations require sound characterization of the primary blast wave, including the temporal and spatial evolution of the static and dynamic components of the blast wave. The goal of this work is to characterize the propagation of shock waves in and around the exit of a shock tube via analysis of the primary shock flow, including shock wave propagation and decay of the shock front, and secondary flow phenomena. To this end, a nine-inch shock tube and a cylindrical sensing apparatus were used to determine incident and total pressures outside of the shock tube, highlighting the presence of additional flow phenomena. Blast overpressure, impulse, shock wave arrival times, positive phase duration, and shock wave planarity were examined using a finite element model of the system. The shock wave remained planar inside of the shock tube and lost its planarity upon exiting. The peak overpressure and pressure impulse decayed rapidly upon exit from the shock tube, reducing by 92-95%. The primary flow phenomenon, or the planar shock front, is observed within the shock tube, while two distinct flow phenomena are a result of the shock wave exiting the confines of the shock tube. A vortex ring is formed as the shock wave exited the shock tube into the still, ambient air, which induces a large increase in the total pressure impulse. Additionally, a rarefaction wave was formed following shock front expansion, which traveled upstream into the shock tube, reducing the total and incident pressure impulses for approximately half of the simulated region.

Indexed as

ExplosionsModels, TheoreticalPressure

Identifiers

PMID31945083
PMCPMC6964877
OpenAlexW3000338352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.