Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31945061›Full record

ReviewPLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

The importance of vector control for the control and elimination of vector-borne diseases.

Anne L Wilson, Orin Courtenay, Louise A Kelly-Hope, Thomas W Scott, Willem Takken, Steve J Torr, Steve W Lindsay

Open access · goldAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 389 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
389citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
82.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

389 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 855 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Acceptability of Integrated Vector Management ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Distinct Swimming Behaviours in Pupae ofEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article

329 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Anne L WilsonDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7387-353X
Orin CourtenayZeeman Institute and School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Louise A Kelly-HopeDepartment of Tropical Disease Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Thomas W ScottDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2947-8123
Willem TakkenDepartment of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Steve J TorrDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Steve W LindsayDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBDurham University · GBUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Warwick · GBWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

Surveillance Core (B)P01AI098670 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI SCOTT, THOMAS WALLACE · 2014 to 2018
$7.9M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L019035/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R00532X/1Medical Research Council G0400031Medical Research Council MR/M007383/1NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI098670
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vector-borne diseases (VBDs) such as malaria, dengue, and leishmaniasis exert a huge burden of morbidity and mortality worldwide, particularly affecting the poorest of the poor. The principal method by which these diseases are controlled is through vector control, which has a long and distinguished history. Vector control, to a greater extent than drugs or vaccines, has been responsible for shrinking the map of many VBDs. Here, we describe the history of vector control programmes worldwide from the late 1800s to date. Pre 1940, vector control relied on a thorough understanding of vector ecology and epidemiology, and implementation of environmental management tailored to the ecology and behaviour of local vector species. This complex understanding was replaced by a simplified dependency on a handful of insecticide-based tools, particularly for malaria control, without an adequate understanding of entomology and epidemiology and without proper monitoring and evaluation. With the rising threat from insecticide-resistant vectors, global environmental change, and the need to incorporate more vector control interventions to eliminate these diseases, we advocate for continued investment in evidence-based vector control. There is a need to return to vector control approaches based on a thorough knowledge of the determinants of pathogen transmission, which utilise a range of insecticide and non-insecticide-based approaches in a locally tailored manner for more effective and sustainable vector control.

Indexed as

Disease VectorsAnimalsHistory, 18th CenturyHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyInsect ControlInsecticidesTick ControlVector Borne DiseasesInsecticides

Identifiers

PMID31945061
PMCPMC6964823
OpenAlexW2999516102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.