ArticlePopulation health management2020
Care Team Integration in Primary Care Improves One-Year Clinical and Financial Outcomes in Diabetes: A Case for Value-Based Care.
Article in Population health management, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can integrated care interventions strengthen primary care and improve outcomes for patients with chronic diseases? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Health research policy and systems · 2025Pooled it
- The use of patient-reported outcome measures to improve patient-related outcomes - a systematic review.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2024Pooled it
- Value-Based Integrated Care: A Systematic Literature Review.International journal of health policy and management · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Dulce Digital-Me: results of a randomized comparative trial of static versus adaptive digital interventions for Latine adults with diabetes.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2025Trial
- Clinical and economic outcomes of multidisciplinary team members in primary care: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- 1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.Diabetes care · 2025Review
- Does value-based healthcare support patient-centred care? A scoping review of the evidence.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Costs of Specialist Referrals From Employer-Sponsored Integrated Health Care Clinics Are Lower Than Those From Community Providers.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- An Expanded Role for the Medical Assistant in Primary Care: Evaluating a Training Pilot.The Permanente journal · 2021Article
- Telehealth Diabetes Prevention Intervention for the Next Generation of African American Youth: Protocol for a Pilot Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2021Article
- Impact of team-based community healthcare on preventable hospitalisation: a population-based cohort study in Taiwan.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Financial models used to embed registered nurses in primary health care settings in the United States: A scoping review.Nursing outlookArticle
- Diabetes Management: A Case Study to Drive National Policy Change in Primary Care Settings.Annals of family medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Despite significant treatment advances, diabetes outcomes remain suboptimal and health care costs continue to rise. There are limited data on the feasibility and financial implications of integrating a diabetes-specific care team in the primary care setting (ie, where the majority of diabetes is treated). This pragmatic quality improvement project investigated whether a cardiometabolic care team intervention (CMC-TI) could achieve greater improvements in clinical, behavioral, and cost outcomes compared to usual diabetes care in a large primary care group in Southern California. Over 12 months, n = 236 CMC-TI and n = 239 usual care patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes were identified using the electronic medical record. In the CMC-TI group, a registered nurse (RN)/certified diabetes educator care manager, medical assistant health coach, and RN depression care manager utilized electronic medical record-based risk stratification reports, standardized decision-support tools, live and remote tailored treatments, and coaching to manage care. Results indicated that the CMC-TI group achieved greater improvements in glycemic and lipid control, diabetes self-management behaviors, and emotional distress over 1 year compared with the usual care group (all
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.