Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31944546›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2020

Higher versus standard starting dose of insulin glargine 100 U/mL in overweight or obese Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: Results of a multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial (BEYOND VII).

Linong Ji, Hailong Wan, Binhong Wen, Xueying Wang, Junfen Wang, Rongwen Bian, Wuyan Pang, Jian Tian, Yan Wang, Fang Bian and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Practical Guidance on Basal Insulin Initiation and Titration in Asia: A Delphi-Based Consensus.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2022
    Article
  8. Effect of Baseline Characteristics on Hypoglycaemia Risk with Insulin Glargine 100 U/mL: Post Hoc Analysis of the BEYOND 7 Study.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Linong JiDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1305-1598
Hailong WanDepartment of Endocrinology, Panjin Central Hospital, Panjin, China.
Binhong WenDepartment of Endocrinology, People's Hospital of Liaoning Province, Liaoning, China.
Xueying WangDepartment of Endocrinology, Jinzhou Central Hospital, Jinzhou, China.
Junfen WangDepartment of Endocrinology, Second Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, China.
Rongwen BianDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Jiangsu Province Institute of Geriatrics, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Wuyan PangDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China.
Jian TianDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang, China.
Yan WangDepartment of Endocrinology, Second Hospital of Chaoyang City, Chaoyang City, China.
Fang BianDepartment of Endocrinology, Cangzhou People's Hospital, Cangzhou, China.
Zhengnan GaoDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Dalian Municipal Central Hospital Affiliated of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Alex CondoleonSanofi, Paris, France.
Wei FengSanofi, Shanghai, China.
Xia ZhangSanofi, Shanghai, China.
Nan CuiSanofi, Shanghai, China.

Funding

This study was funded by Sanofi China.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo determine the safety of a higher starting dose of basal insulin in overweight/obese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis 16-week, randomized, multicentre, open-label trial enrolled adults with T2D (body mass index 25-40 kg/m

resultsAt the end of study (n = 866), 11.0% patients treated with the 0.3 U/kg starting insulin dose experienced overall confirmed hypoglycaemia versus 8.6% of patients treated with 0.2 U/kg (estimated difference 2.1%, 95% confidence interval - 1.68, 5.89). The proportions of patients with symptomatic (9.8% vs 7.0%; P = 0.128) and nocturnal hypoglycaemia (2.7% vs 1.2%; P = 0.102) were similar in the two groups. There were no events of severe hypoglycaemia or FBG <3.0 mmol/L during the 16-week treatment, and achievement of HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) (37.1% vs 37.1%) or FPG <5.6 mmol/L (15.9% vs 16.3%), <6.1 mmol/L (27.6% vs 26.1%), or < 7.0 mmol/L (48.8% vs 48.3%) without hypoglycaemia were comparable in the two groups. Moreover, the mean time was shorter (4.53, 3.95 and 2.74 weeks vs 5.51, 5.21 and 3.64 weeks) and number of titrations was lower (3.5, 3.0 and 2.0 vs 4.3, 4.0 and 2.8) to achieve self-monitored FBG targets of <5.6, <6.1 and <7.0 mmol/L in the higher versus the standard insulin dose group (all P < 0.01).

conclusionsAmong overweight/obese patients with T2D, a higher insulin starting dose was as safe as the standard starting dose, and self-monitored FBG targets were achieved earlier with the higher versus the standard dose.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2AdultBlood GlucoseChinaGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin GlargineObesityOverweightBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin Glarginefasting plasma glucoseglycated haemoglobinhypoglycaemiainsulin glargineoral antidiabetic drugsself-monitored fasting glucosetype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID31944546
PMCPMC7187195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.